• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES CARPENTIER-EDWARDS PHYSIO ANNULOPLASTY RING

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES CARPENTIER-EDWARDS PHYSIO ANNULOPLASTY RING Back to Search Results
Model Number 4450
Device Problem Appropriate Term/Code Not Available (3191)
Patient Problem Mitral Regurgitation (1964)
Event Date 07/06/2016
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).Ring dehiscence may occur early or late.When it occurs in the late post-operative period, it is typically a result of successive dilatation of cardiac structures that result from progression of disease.In this case, although there have been attempts to receive further information regarding the device and event, no additional details were provided and the explanted device was not returned to edwards for analysis.At this time, edwards is unable to conclusively determine the root cause for this event.The device history record (dhr) review was completed and this device passed all manufacturing and sterilization inspections.If further information becomes available, a follow-up report will be submitted.
 
Event Description
Edwards lifesciences maintains an implant patient registry.This registry is a patient tracking mechanism for serialized edwards implantable devices (bioprosthetic heart valves and annuloplasty rings), rather than a true post-market surveillance registry.Through the registry, edwards is notified when these devices are implanted.In addition, patient and/or device status may be reported to the registry via the implantation data cards.The information is received from various sources (e.G.Surgeon, hospital, and patient family members) and is not received in the form of a conventional "customer complaint".The information reported may or may not be related to the edwards device.In this case, edwards received information that this 30mm annuloplasty ring was explanted after two (2) years, seven (7) months due to mitral regurgitation, secondary to partial dehiscence.This was replaced with a 31mm pericardial bioprosthesis and no additional details were provided.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Device evaluation summary - x-ray demonstrated ring intact.Heavy host tissue was observed, and sutures remained attached around the ring.The reported clinical observation cannot be confirmed through device evaluation.Host tissue was found on the ring.Host tissue/pannus growth is a complex process triggered by the interaction between the host and the device and is highly variable among patients.Literature defines pannus as a type of scarring and tissue ingrowth.It is not currently possible to predict the occurrence and severity for any given patient with a bioprosthetic heart valve.A certain degree of host tissue growth is expected.However, abnormal or severe pannus growth can eventually affect the function of the valve.According to literature, pannus typically occurs between 12 months to 5 years.Pannus occurring prior to 12 months is rare and suggests patient factors may have played a significant role.Since the mechanism of host tissue growth in bioprosthetic heart valves is still not fully understood, the root cause for the host tissue growth for this particular valve cannot be determined at this time.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Additional manufacturer narrative: a manufacturing related issue was not identified.The root cause of the regurgitation was partial ring dehiscence.It is likely that patient related factors and the progression of the underlying valvular disease pathology contributed to the event.There was no objective evidence of a manufacturing or design defect that caused the ring to not function as intended.The instructions for use (ifu) was reviewed and no inadequacies were identified with regards to warnings, contraindications, and the directions/conditions for the successful use of the device.Edwards adequately addresses potential causes of failure and the associated hazards.Potential cause of failure is progression of disease, deterioration of tissue or undersized ring used.The complaint trend was assessed and it was found to be in control.No further corrective or preventative actions are required at this time.Trends will continue to be monitored through the use of edwards quality systems.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
CARPENTIER-EDWARDS PHYSIO ANNULOPLASTY RING
Type of Device
ANNULOPLASTY RING
Manufacturer (Section D)
EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES
one edwards way
irvine CA 92614
Manufacturer (Section G)
EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES LLC
one edwards way
irvine CA 92614
Manufacturer Contact
neil landry
1 edwards way
ms: t&d 2nd floor, office t223
irvine, CA 92614
9492502289
MDR Report Key5890764
MDR Text Key52609947
Report Number2015691-2016-02567
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code KRH
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K926138
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type health professional,other,use
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 07/27/2016
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date05/06/2018
Device Model Number4450
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 07/27/2016
Initial Date FDA Received08/19/2016
Supplement Dates Manufacturer ReceivedNot provided
Not provided
Supplement Dates FDA Received09/29/2016
10/28/2016
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured05/16/2013
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Hospitalization; Required Intervention;
Patient Age69 YR
-
-