• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BOSTON SCIENTIFIC - MAPLE GROVE COMET; TRANSDUCER, PRESSURE, CATHETER TIP

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BOSTON SCIENTIFIC - MAPLE GROVE COMET; TRANSDUCER, PRESSURE, CATHETER TIP Back to Search Results
Model Number H7493932430
Device Problems Break (1069); Detachment of Device or Device Component (2907)
Patient Problem No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
Event Date 07/20/2016
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).
 
Event Description
It was reported that a wire break occurred.The target lesion was located in the extremely tortuous circumflex (cx) artery.The physician noted difficulty getting the comet wire to the distal cx lesion.When pulling back the comet wire, the 15cm distal part of comet broke and was hanging partly in guide catheter and artery.Using trapping technic the physician retrieved the 15cm broken wire.The procedure was completed with a different device.No patient complications were reported.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Updated: device evaluated by mfr.Returned product consisted of a ffr comet wire.The device was separated; however, the separated piece was not returned.The shaft was separated approximately 15cm from the tip.The separated portion of the device was retrieved from the patient but was not returned for evaluation.The fracture face shows evidence of fatigue due to the crack propagation lines moving towards the middle of the fracture surface.Some fracture faces show evidence of a small dimple region.This would indicate that reverse bending occurred under a cyclic stress, resulting in failure in the middle with ductile overload.Secondary damage is also present on all fracture surfaces.No other damage or irregularities were noticed.The manufacturing batch record review confirmed that the device met all material, assembly and performance specifications.The most probable root cause is operational context as device performance was limited due to anatomical procedural factors.(b)(4).
 
Event Description
It was reported that a wire break occurred.The target lesion was located in the extremely tortuous circumflex (cx) artery.The physician noted difficulty getting the comet wire to the distal cx lesion.When pulling back the comet wire, the 15cm distal part of comet broke and was hanging partly in guide catheter and artery.Using trapping technic the physician retrieved the 15cm broken wire.The procedure was completed with a different device.No patient complications were reported.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
COMET
Type of Device
TRANSDUCER, PRESSURE, CATHETER TIP
Manufacturer (Section D)
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC - MAPLE GROVE
one scimed place
maple grove MN 55311
Manufacturer Contact
linda leimer
one scimed place
maple grove, MN 55311
7634941700
MDR Report Key5896060
MDR Text Key52735504
Report Number2134265-2016-07453
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code DXO
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeBE
PMA/PMN Number
NA
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,foreig
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 07/27/2016
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date02/28/2017
Device Model NumberH7493932430
Device Lot Number19250936
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer08/11/2016
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 07/27/2016
Initial Date FDA Received08/23/2016
Supplement Dates Manufacturer ReceivedNot provided
Supplement Dates FDA Received10/25/2016
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured05/14/2016
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
-
-