• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: NAKANISHI INC. NSK; HANDPIECE, AIR-POWERED, DENTAL

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

NAKANISHI INC. NSK; HANDPIECE, AIR-POWERED, DENTAL Back to Search Results
Model Number S-MAX M600L
Device Problems Detachment Of Device Component (1104); Mechanical Problem (1384); Detachment of Device or Device Component (2907)
Patient Problem No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
Event Date 07/29/2016
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Nakanishi was not informed of the patient identifier and weight when receiving the initial information.Nakanishi will try to obtain the information at the next visit to the dentist scheduled in (b)(6).
 
Event Description
On (b)(6) 2016, nakanishi received a phone call from a distributor regarding a bur coming off from an nsk handpiece.The details are as follows.On (b)(6) 2016, a dentist was providing a patient with an oral cavity preparation.The bur suddenly came off from the handpiece in the patient's mouth.The dentist found the bur around the patient's throat and tried to pick the bur up with a suction instrument.The dentist confirmed the bur was removed from the patient's mouth.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
On september 7, 2016, nakanishi visited the dentist and tried to obtain the patient identifier and weight, but the dentist did not provide the information.Upon receiving the device involved in the mdr event from a distributor, nakanishi conducted a failure analysis of the returned device (b)(4).These activities are described in more detail below.Methodology used: nakanishi examined the device history record and the repair history for the subject s-max m600l device [serial number (b)(4)].There were no problems observed during the manufacturing or testing noted in the dhr.The repair history showed 1 service record ((b)(6) 2016) since the device was shipped.According to the service record, after repairing the handpiece (replacement of headcap and cartridge), nakanishi performed all of the necessary operation checks.Nakanishi confirmed that all of the criteria were met.Nakanishi measured the bur retention force with a 1.598mm (diameter) test bur.The value nakanishi observed was 25.7n, which meets the company criteria (25n or greater).Nakanishi tried cutting a crown and melamine using the returned bur attached to the returned handpiece to see whether or not the bur would come off.The bur did not come off during the cutting test.Nakanishi disassembled the handpiece cartridge and performed a visual inspection of the chuck.There was abrasion that may have been caused by bur slippage (slip traces) on the bur holding part.Nakanishi checked the diameter of the bur shank and confirmed that the bur was compliant with the iso standard.During the diameter confirmation, nakanishi also observed slip traces marked in the direction of rotation on the bur shank.Additionally, nakanishi found rotational contact traces on the side of the pusher that comes in contact with the push button when it is pressed, as well as on the surface of the cartridge pusher inside the headcap.Nakanishi took photographs of all of the damages on the disassembled parts and kept them in a file.Conclusions reached based on the investigation and analysis results: nakanishi identified from all of the traces formed by cutting under high load that the cause of the reported bur coming off was load exceeding the bur retention force applied to the bur during cutting.Nakanishi also considers the possibility from many years of experience that the cause of the bur coming off was bur slippage caused by insufficient bur retention force due to ingress of dirt/foreign materials into the chuck.Misuse by the user leads to operation under high load, and a lack of maintenance causes the accumulation of dirt/foreign materials in the inside part, which contributes to the reported bur coming off.In order to prevent a recurrence of the bur coming off, nakanishi took the following actions: nakanishi reviewed the operation manual and reconfirmed clarity and understandability of the instructions.Nakanishi reported the above evaluation results to the dentist and reminded the dentist of the risk of use under high load and the importance of maintenance (cleaning), as instructed in the operation manual.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
NSK
Type of Device
HANDPIECE, AIR-POWERED, DENTAL
Manufacturer (Section D)
NAKANISHI INC.
700 shimohinata
kanuma-shi, tochigi-ken 322-8 666
JA  322-8666
Manufacturer (Section G)
NAKANISHI INC.
700 shimohinata
kanuma-shi, tochigi-ken 322-8 666
JA   322-8666
Manufacturer Contact
kenneth block
1201 richardson dr.
suite 160
richardson, TX 75080
9724809554
MDR Report Key5899576
MDR Text Key52841061
Report Number9611253-2016-00044
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code EFB
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeJA
PMA/PMN Number
K962543
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type distributor,foreign
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 12/22/2016
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Dentist
Device Model NumberS-MAX M600L
Device Catalogue NumberP1002
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer08/04/2016
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 07/29/2016
Initial Date FDA Received08/24/2016
Supplement Dates Manufacturer ReceivedNot provided
Supplement Dates FDA Received12/23/2016
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured07/11/2012
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Reuse
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Other;
Patient Age69 YR
-
-