Catalog Number 80400 |
Device Problems
Device Alarm System (1012); Improper or Incorrect Procedure or Method (2017); Device Displays Incorrect Message (2591)
|
Patient Problem
No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
|
Event Date 08/10/2016 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Investigation: a trima platelet collection set with the channel and platelet bag removed was returned for investigation.Upon visual inspection, it was observed that the customer had sectioned off the return line to preserve evidence of the observed air to blood ratio.The set was visually inspected for any misassemblies or defects.It was noted that the upper bearing had not been locked to the ears on the upper loop sleeve.Witness line on the lower hex indicated that the hex was locked and properly loaded.It was observed that the return reservoir had some foaming/bubbles, and was approximately half way full.Through inspection of the loop, it was noted that customer likely performed a rinse back since the 4 lumen tubing at the lower hex all were filled with clear fluid with a light yellow coloration.The return line on the 4 lumen tubing had some signs of clotting.There was evidence of sterile docking on both the donor line and the sample line.The run data file (rdf) was analyzed for this event.The analysis did not find any conclusive cause for air in the return line.No unusual process variable was identified and the trima accel system operated as intended.Investigation is in progress.A follow-up report will be provided.
|
|
Event Description
|
The customer reported that during a platelet collection procedure, they received multiple alarms including 'draw pressure too low', and 'return pressure too high' alarms.They determined the venipuncture was unsuccessful.The operator paused the procedure and sterile docked a new needle to the platelet collection set.After the 2nd venipuncture of the platelet donor, they received a 'level sensor error' alarm and noticed air in the return line.The operator stopped and discontinued the procedure.No medical intervention was required for this event.Per the customer no air was returned to the patient (donor) and the patient (donor) is 'fine'.Patient (donor) identifier and age are not available at this time.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
A review of the device history record (dhr) for this unit showed no irregularities during manufacturing that were relevant to this issue.Per the customer, there have been no further similar issues on the machine.The analysis did not find any conclusive cause for air in the return line.No unusual process variable was identified and the trima accel system operated as intended.It is possible that the set was not fully primed prior to the procedure.
|
|
Event Description
|
The customer declined to provide patient identifier and age.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|