• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: SYNTHES MONUMENT HOLDING SLEEVE-LONG FOR MATRIX; MISC ORTHO SURGICAL INSTR

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

SYNTHES MONUMENT HOLDING SLEEVE-LONG FOR MATRIX; MISC ORTHO SURGICAL INSTR Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 03.632.036
Device Problem Device Damaged by Another Device (2915)
Patient Problem No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
Event Date 07/26/2016
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
Patient initials: (b)(6).Patient weight is unknown device is an instrument and is not implanted/explanted.Part 03.632.036, lot 7492388: release to warehouse date: january 27, 2014.Supplier: (b)(4).No non-conformance reports were generated during production.Review of the device history record(s) showed that there were no issues during the manufacture of this product that would contribute to this complaint condition.The device was received, the investigation could not be completed, and no conclusion could be drawn, as product is entering the complaint system.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
 
Event Description
It was reported that during posterior l3-l5 spinal fusion surgery using matrix spine system on (b)(6) 2016, there was an issue with a holding sleeve.When the surgeon was on left side in l5 implanting screw with holding sleeve (long), the retaining sleeve interfaced with screw head and screw was daggling.When surgeon pulled out the screw, screw was found damaged and a thread is hanging off of the screw.A second screw was implanted using the same holding sleeve and the holding sleeve interfaced with screw head and when the surgeon pulled out the screw, screw was found cracked.Then the third screw was implanted using the second holding sleeve and the procedure was completed successfully.There was surgical delay of fifteen (15) minutes.There were no fragments generated and both screws were removed easily.Patient status is reported as stable.Upon investigation after the surgery, it was found that the threads on second sleeve were damaged.Upon visual inspection of returned device by the manufacturer it was noted the first holding sleeve which was used with first and second screws had damaged thread tip.Device will be assessed as part of the complaint and is no longer considered concomitant.This is report 2 of 2 for (b)(4).
 
Manufacturer Narrative
An investigation summary was performed.The investigation of the complaint articles has shown that: it was reported that during an l3-l5 fusion procedure utilized the matrix spine system, the surgeon experienced difficulty inserting a pedicle screw into the left side of the l5 vertebra.Two screws and two holding sleeves were damaged attempting to insert a screw at the location.The procedure was able to be completed successfully after a 15 minute surgical delay.The returned devices were examined and in each instance the complaint conditions were able to be confirmed.Parts 3-4: holding sleeve - long (03.632.036 lots 7492388/6972477) the returned matrix holding sleeves (03.632.036) were examined and the complaint conditions were able to be confirmed in each instance.The threaded tip for lot 7492388 was found to be cracked, but intact, and the threaded tip for lot 6972477 was found to be missing a segment for the distal-most thread (approximately 2.75mm x 1mm x 0.5mm ¿ calipers ca94).No definitive root cause was able to be determined; the failure modes are consistent with the application of an off-axis load while engaging a screw.During the investigation no product design issues or discrepancies were observed that may have contributed to the complaint condition.A visual inspection, complaint history review, drawing review, and risk assessment review were performed as part of this investigation.No product design issues or discrepancies were observed.This complaint is confirmed.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
HOLDING SLEEVE-LONG FOR MATRIX
Type of Device
MISC ORTHO SURGICAL INSTR
Manufacturer (Section D)
SYNTHES MONUMENT
1051 synthes ave
monument CO 80132
Manufacturer (Section G)
SYNTHES MONUMENT
1051 synthes ave
monument CO 80132
Manufacturer Contact
mark vornheder
1302 wrights lane east
west chester, PA 19380
6107195000
MDR Report Key5924239
MDR Text Key53792293
Report Number1719045-2016-10662
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LXH
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
EXEMPT
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,health
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 07/26/2016
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue Number03.632.036
Device Lot Number7492388
Other Device ID Number(01)10705034718941(10)7492388
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer08/02/2016
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 08/12/2016
Initial Date FDA Received09/02/2016
Supplement Dates Manufacturer ReceivedNot provided
Not provided
Supplement Dates FDA Received09/19/2016
09/21/2016
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured01/27/2014
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Unknown
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age47 YR
-
-