Memory data extracted from the patient's device were provided to the manufacturer and reviewed.They indicated the following: on (b)(6) 2016, heart rate was initially unable to be sensed by the generator.However, once the device was interrogated at sensitivity 4, a foreground heart rate of 90.1 bpm was detected.When the patient came back on (b)(6) 2016, it appears that there was again evidence of heart rate (82.7 bpm).Given this information, it appears that the generator was able to accurately sense at higher sensitivity levels (4-5).However, one reason why the programmer may not have been able to display the value (showed ????) on (b)(6) 2016 could be because the output current was programmed on, which is known to interfere with picking up this value during stimulation.It appeared also that on (b)(6) 2016, the settings were tested on 2 and 5 with outputs disabled.At this time, however, based on the information we have the generator was at least intermittently sensing.
|