• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: CYBERONICS PULSE GEN MODEL 104; GENERATOR

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

CYBERONICS PULSE GEN MODEL 104; GENERATOR Back to Search Results
Model Number 104
Device Problems Failure to Deliver Energy (1211); Device Expiration Issue (1216); High impedance (1291); Power Problem (3010)
Patient Problem No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
Event Date 01/22/2008
Event Type  malfunction  
Event Description
It was reported that a vns patient underwent device replacement surgery on (b)(6) 2015.It was reported that the device was replaced due to end of service (eos).The explanted device was returned to the manufacturer on 04/28/2016.Analysis of the returned generator was completed and it appeared that the generator was received at the product analysis laboratory (pa lab) with an eos warning message and the output being disabled due to the generator remaining on after explant.Due to the high impedance and the generator remaining on after explant, a 'vboost' voltage was required which was higher than the maximum voltage capability for the generator.This is not considered a device failure, but is an expected event due to the generator remaining on after explant.The eos warning message was verified by the battery voltage (2.1v) and the data in the diagaccum consumed memory locations (85% of battery consumed).Furthermore a battery life calculation (blc) resulted in 2.3 years until near eos at time of explant.Since the generator remained on after explant, an extra blc was performed taking this into account.The generator had 0 years until near eos at the time it was received at the pa lab.The c4 capacitor was out of specifications.This decreased capacitance condition is an expected event for an aged capacitor of the type used for c4, as the manufacturing test limits for c4 value do not take aging into account.This condition does not indicate a failure of the device or the component, and is not expected to have an adverse effect on battery longevity.The supply current off-time test did not meet its functional specifications.This measurement demonstrates an increased current consumption for the device, potentially contributing to end-of-service.When the c3 capacitor was changed with another c3 capacitor, this problem no longer occurred.The cause for the capacitors (c3) increase in leakage could not be determined.The amount that the capacitor (c3) may have potentially contributed to end-of-service (eos) could not be determined; since the most probable root cause for the eos is the generator remaining on after explant.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
PULSE GEN MODEL 104
Type of Device
GENERATOR
Manufacturer (Section D)
CYBERONICS
100 cyberonics blvd
houston TX 77058
Manufacturer (Section G)
CYBERONICS, INC.
100 cyberonics blvd
suite 600
houston TX 77058
Manufacturer Contact
njemile crawley
100 cyberonics blvd
suite 600
houston, TX 77058
2812287200
MDR Report Key5942440
MDR Text Key54794941
Report Number1644487-2016-02049
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LYJ
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P970003
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,foreig
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 08/23/2016
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Lay User/Patient
Device Expiration Date01/31/2010
Device Model Number104
Device Lot Number200699
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer04/28/2016
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Event Location Other
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 08/23/2016
Initial Date FDA Received09/12/2016
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured01/22/2008
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age33 YR
-
-