Medtronic received report of pipeline flex pushwire separation as well as clot formation during a procedure.The patient was undergoing treatment for an unruptured, saccular aneurysm at the left internal carotid artery (ica) terminus.The an eurysm max.Diameter was 14mm and neck diameter was 5mm.Landing zone artery size was 2.80mm distal and 3.23mm proximal.The vessel was minimally tortuous.The devices were prepared as indicated in the ifu.The pipeline flex was deployed.The physician attempted to resheath the device in order to reposition it at which time the pushwire separated at the proximal portion of the resheathing pad.There was reportedly no friction or difficulty when separation occurred.The physician attempted to pull and retrieve the entire system (including the partially deployed device) into the intermediate catheter, but the device deployed into the ica/m1 middle cerebral artery (mca) segment.When deployed, the braid was only partially covering (90%) the aneurysm neck and the proximal section was not fully open.An unsuccessful attempt was made to snare the braid as well as the detached wire (which was inside the braid).Afterward, the snare was used to bump the proximal end of the braid, which fully opened.The broken wire was able to be snared and removed.A new catheter was used to access the neck of the aneurysm and implant coils.Angiography demonstrated possible clot formation along the device.A bolus of reopro was administered followed by iv drip.
|
Additional manufacturer narrative - device evaluation, additional information in regards to the report of pipeline flex failure to open, the event could not be confirmed as the braid was not returned for evaluation; the cause for the braid failure to open could not be conclusively determined from the reported information.In regards to the report of pipeline flex pushwire detachment at the hypotube proximal to the wire weld, the event was confirmed based on gross analysis as well as scanning electron micrographic (sem) / energy dispersive x-ray spectroscopy (eds) analysis.The distal wire was possibly detached due to tensile failure.From the damage observed on the proximal wire (bending) and hypotube (stretching), it is likely that excessive force was applied by the user (pushing and pulling) subsequently causing the solder joint to separate.A review of the manufacturing process did not uncover any deficiencies in regards to the soldering process.Proper soldering technique and surface preparation are well defined and documented appropriately in the associated manufacturing procedures.In addition, the elemental analysis conducted through sem and eds indicate presence of soldering material, thereby indicating that the soldering was conducted.The lot history record of the reported lot number was reviewed and no discrepancies that might have caused the reported event were noted.All products are 100% inspected for damage and irregularities during manufacture.Per our instructions for use (ifu): "discontinue delivery of the device if high force or excessive friction is encountered.Identify the cause of the resistance and remove device and microcatheter simultaneously.Advancement of the ped against resistance may result in device damage or patient injury.Never advance or withdraw an intraluminal device against resistance until the cause of resistance is determined by fluoroscopy.If the cause cannot be determined, withdraw the catheter.Movement of the micro catheter against resistance may result in damage to the micro catheter, or the vessel.¿.
|