• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BOSTON SCIENTIFIC - MARLBOROUGH STONE CONE NITINOL UROLOGICAL RETRIEVAL COIL; DISLODGER, STONE, FLEXIBLE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BOSTON SCIENTIFIC - MARLBOROUGH STONE CONE NITINOL UROLOGICAL RETRIEVAL COIL; DISLODGER, STONE, FLEXIBLE Back to Search Results
Model Number M0063903100
Device Problem Detachment of Device or Device Component (2907)
Patient Problem No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
The complainant was unable to provide the suspect device lot number; therefore, the lot expiration and device manufacture dates are unknown.However, the complainant stated that the device was used prior to the expiration date.(b)(6).Medwatch# 5063754.The complainant indicated that the device was disposed and will not be returned for evaluation; therefore, a failure analysis of the complaint device could not be completed.If any further relevant information is identified, a supplemental medwatch will be filed.
 
Event Description
It was reported to boston scientific corporation that a stone cone nitinol urological retrieval coil was used during a cystourethroscopy and ureteroscopy (urs) with laser lithotripsy procedure performed on (b)(6) 2015, at an unknown hospital.According to the complainant, during the procedure, the distal part of the device detached in the patient's right ureter.The detachment was not initially discovered, and there were no patient complications reported.Approximately 2 weeks post-procedure, the patient stated that "an umbrella like device which appeared to be made of cellophane passed through his urethra".Ct scan revealed that a foreign body was noted to be in the right ureter.The foreign body was unable to be removed ureteroscopically, thus surgical intervention was required.It was not documented that the device came into contact with the laser during the procedure, but according to the complainant that is the assumption.On (b)(6) 2016, at (b)(6) mc, during a right antegrade ureteroscopy with stent placement procedure, two mildly encrusted fragments of stone cone nitinol urological retrieval coil device were retrieved.There were no patient complications reported as a result of this event.The patient's condition at the conclusion of the procedure was reported to be good.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Visual analysis of the returned device found that retrieval coil was detached/ separated and only approximately 5.5 cm of the distal end was returned.The returned piece is the distal end of the coil including the distal stop and ball weld.Review and analysis of all available information indicates that the device damage was caused by encountered anatomical or procedural factors which limits its performance.Therefore, the most probable root cause is "operational context".A labeling review was performed and, from the information available, this device was used per the directions for use (dfu) / product label. .
 
Event Description
It was reported to boston scientific corporation that a stone cone nitinol urological retrieval coil was used during a cystourethroscopy and ureteroscopy (urs) with laser lithotripsy procedure performed on (b)(6) 2015, at an unknown hospital.According to the complainant, during the procedure, the distal part of the device detached in the patients right ureter.The detachment was not initially discovered, and there were no patient complications reported.Approximately 2 weeks post-procedure, the patient stated that "an umbrella like device which appeared to be made of cellophane passed through his urethra." ct scan revealed that a foreign body was noted to be in the right ureter.The foreign body was unable to be removed ureteroscopically, thus surgical intervention was required.It was not documented that the device came into contact with the laser during the procedure, but according to the complainant that is the assumption.On (b)(6) 2016, at richmond vamc, during a right antegrade ureteroscopy with stent placement procedure, two mildly encrusted fragments of stone cone nitinol urological retrieval coil device were retrieved.There were no patient complications reported as a result of this event.The patient's condition at the conclusion of the procedure was reported to be good.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
STONE CONE NITINOL UROLOGICAL RETRIEVAL COIL
Type of Device
DISLODGER, STONE, FLEXIBLE
Manufacturer (Section D)
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC - MARLBOROUGH
100 boston scientific way
marlborough MA 01752
Manufacturer (Section G)
ACCELLENT ENDOSCOPY JUAREZ
31c butterfield trail
el paso TX 79906
Manufacturer Contact
nancy cutino
100 boston scientific way
marlborough, MA 01752
5086834000
MDR Report Key5959181
MDR Text Key54992191
Report Number3005099803-2016-02629
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code FGO
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
EXEMPT
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,health
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 08/23/2016
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberM0063903100
Device Catalogue Number390-310
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer10/06/2016
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 08/23/2016
Initial Date FDA Received09/18/2016
Supplement Dates Manufacturer ReceivedNot provided
Supplement Dates FDA Received11/15/2016
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Hospitalization; Required Intervention;
Patient Age69 YR
Patient Weight118
-
-