• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BOSTON SCIENTIFIC - SPENCER TRAPEZOID¿ RX; LITHOTRIPTOR, BILIARY MECHANICAL

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BOSTON SCIENTIFIC - SPENCER TRAPEZOID¿ RX; LITHOTRIPTOR, BILIARY MECHANICAL Back to Search Results
Model Number M00510890
Device Problem Detachment Of Device Component (1104)
Patient Problems Perforation (2001); No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
Event Date 08/11/2016
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).Patient's exact age is unknown; however it was reported that the patient was under the age of 18.The device has not been received for analysis.Upon receipt and completion of the failure analysis of the complaint device, if there is any further relevant information from that review, a supplemental medwatch will be filed.
 
Event Description
It was reported to boston scientific corporation that a trapezoid¿ rx basket was used in the bile duct during a procedure performed on (b)(6) 2016.According to the complainant, during the procedure, when withdrawing the device from the bile duct, the basket detached and remained inside the patient.The basket was scheduled for removal within 4-6 weeks from the date of the procedure.Attempts to obtain additional information regarding the circumstances surrounding this event have been unsuccessful to date.Should additional relevant details become available, a supplemental mdr will be submitted.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Visual evaluation of the returned device found the side car-rx was torn and presented pushback out of specification.Further evaluation found the pull wire was kinked and broken.The remaining part of the pull wire with basket was not returned.During the procedure, manipulation of the device and interaction with the scope or other devices could have contributed to the failures of side car-rx pushback and torn, and pull wire kinked.It cannot be determined precisely how the pull wire failed.Stone size and density, user technique, tortuous anatomy and other procedural factors could possibly contribute to the failure by causing the tensile force applied by the user to not be fully distributed throughout the device.Therefore, the most probable root cause of this complaint is operational context, since it is most likely that due to anatomical and/or procedural factors encountered during the procedure, performance was limited.The device history record (dhr) review found the device met all manufacturing specifications.A search of the complaint database revealed that no similar complaints exist for the specified lot.A labeling review was performed and no anomaly was found.
 
Event Description
It was reported to boston scientific corporation that a trapezoid" rx basket was used in the bile duct during a procedure performed on (b)(6) 2016.According to the complainant, during the procedure, when withdrawing the device from the bile duct, the basket detached and remained inside the patient.The basket was scheduled for removal within 4-6 weeks from the date of the procedure.Attempts to obtain additional information regarding the circumstances surrounding this event have been unsuccessful to date.Should additional relevant details become available, a supplemental mdr will be submitted.
 
Event Description
It was reported to boston scientific corporation that a trapezoid¿ rx basket was used in the bile duct during a procedure performed on (b)(6) 2016.According to the complainant, during the procedure, when withdrawing the device from the bile duct, the basket detached and remained inside the patient.The basket was scheduled for removal within 4-6 weeks from the date of the procedure.Attempts to obtain additional information regarding the circumstances surrounding this event have been unsuccessful to date.Should additional relevant details become available, a supplemental mdr will be submitted.Additional information received as of 13dec2016: the patient had returned five months after the event to have the detached basket removed, instead of 1 month later.During the removal procedure, the rigid shaft was noticed to have perforated the intestine and the other extremity was stuck into the pericardium.The detached basket with captured stone was successfully removed from the patient.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
TRAPEZOID¿ RX
Type of Device
LITHOTRIPTOR, BILIARY MECHANICAL
Manufacturer (Section D)
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC - SPENCER
780 brookside drive
spencer IN 47460
Manufacturer (Section G)
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC - SPENCER
780 brookside drive
spencer IN 47460
Manufacturer Contact
nancy cutino
100 boston scientific way
marlborough, MA 01752
5086834000
MDR Report Key5962042
MDR Text Key55096608
Report Number3005099803-2016-02837
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LQC
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeFR
PMA/PMN Number
K040447
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,foreig
Reporter Occupation Pharmacist
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 08/24/2016
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date10/18/2016
Device Model NumberM00510890
Device Catalogue Number1089
Device Lot Number18528481
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer09/22/2016
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 08/24/2016
Initial Date FDA Received09/19/2016
Supplement Dates Manufacturer ReceivedNot provided
Not provided
Supplement Dates FDA Received11/10/2016
01/09/2017
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured10/20/2015
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
-
-