• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BIOSENSE WEBSTER, INC. (IRWINDALE) NAVISTAR® THERMOCOOL®; SIMILAR DEVICE NI75TCJH, PMA # P030031

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BIOSENSE WEBSTER, INC. (IRWINDALE) NAVISTAR® THERMOCOOL®; SIMILAR DEVICE NI75TCJH, PMA # P030031 Back to Search Results
Model Number D-1197-00
Device Problem Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Patient Problem Pulmonary Embolism (1498)
Event Date 10/30/2014
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
No device was received for analysis at the time of submission of the initial 3500a.Since the product was not returned for analysis, no product failure analysis can be conducted and no determination of possible contributing factors could be made.Device history record (dhr) review cannot be conducted because no lot number was provided by the customer.Concomitant products were used during this study: carto 3 system and a spiral diagnostic decapolar mapping lasso catheter.Other company¿s devices were used during this study: sl1 sheaths (st.Jude medical, (b)(4), usa).Method: no testing methods performed.Results: no results available since no evaluation performed.Conclusion: device discarded by user, unable to follow-up.(b)(4).The device was not returned to bwi.
 
Event Description
This event is from a literature source.It was reported that one patient developed a pulmonary embolism, that lead to prolonged hospital stay >48 hours from noac group (group 2).Based on the facts of the case and the author's assessment, there were no reported malfunction with any of the bwi catheters and systems used during the case.Thus, this event is unrelated to the device and most likely related to the procedure.Title:apixaban, rivaroxaban, and dabigatran in patients undergoing atrial fibrillation ablation.The purpose of this study was to evaluate the periprocedural major complications (mc) of ca of af, and compared apixaban, dabigatran, and rivaroxaban with continuous phenoprocoumon.The study was conducted between (b)(6) 2013 and (b)(6) 2014.Suspected device is the thermocool navi-star, biosense webster catheter, however catalog and lot number are unknown.Should more information be received, product for this adverse event will be modified as appropriate.Concomitant products were used during this study: carto 3 system and a spiral diagnostic decapolar mapping lasso catheter.Other company's devices were used during this study: sl1 sheaths (st.Jude medical, (b)(6), usa).The awareness date for this complaint is 9/06/2016 because the article was reviewed on 09/6/2016.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
NAVISTAR® THERMOCOOL®
Type of Device
SIMILAR DEVICE NI75TCJH, PMA # P030031
Manufacturer (Section D)
BIOSENSE WEBSTER, INC. (IRWINDALE)
15715 arrow highway
irwindale CA 91706
Manufacturer (Section G)
BIOSENSE WEBSTER, INC. (IRWINDALE)
15715 arrow highway
irwindale CA 91706
Manufacturer Contact
joaquin kurz
33 technology drive
irvine, CA 92618
9497893837
MDR Report Key5988734
MDR Text Key55994888
Report Number2029046-2016-00143
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code DRF
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeGM
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type foreign,literature
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 09/07/2016
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberD-1197-00
Device Catalogue NumberD119700
Device Lot NumberUNKNOWN_NAVISTAR THERMO TC
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 09/06/2016
Initial Date FDA Received09/29/2016
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Type of Device Usage N
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Hospitalization; Other;
Patient Age65 YR
-
-