Clarification received from physician: "there was only one problem related to the stent in one patient that was readmitted one week after stent placement with an bent stent causing severe obstruction of the aortic lumen; the patient needed a urgent intervention by placing a second stent to correct the problem.No further information is available." engineering analysis: the article indicates that the v12 large diameter stent was placed within a coarctation of the aorta and after one week the patient was re-admitted as the stent had bent causing a severe obstruction.There have been no images of the stent upon initial deployment or of the stent once discovered that it had been bent.If images were provided they may have provided additional details of how the stent was deployed and if the stent was well opposed to the vessel wall.Without this detail a root cause of the complaint is difficult to determine.As the lot number of the device in question was not provided a review of the manufacturing and quality inspection paperwork including quality control lot qualification information could not be reviewed.Engineering summary: based on the lack of catheter lot number information, images or details a root cause into the complaint cannot be assessed.Conclusion: atrium cannot conclude that the device failure is the result of the manufacturing process, material defect or non-conformance to design requirements.
|