• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES EDWARDS MC3 TRICUSPID ANNULOPLASTY SYSTEM; RING, ANNULOPLASTY

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES EDWARDS MC3 TRICUSPID ANNULOPLASTY SYSTEM; RING, ANNULOPLASTY Back to Search Results
Model Number 4900
Device Problem Appropriate Term/Code Not Available (3191)
Patient Problems Atrial Fibrillation (1729); Occlusion (1984); Complete Heart Block (2627)
Event Date 01/01/2015
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
The literature states that: in this presented case of iatrogenic rca injury during mitral and tricuspid valve repair, a new isolated inferior basal wall motion abnormality was identified on tee soon after release of the aortic cross-clamp.While all new signs suggestive of myocardial ischemia following cardiac surgery should be investigated thoroughly, the appearance of new inferior basal wall hypokinesia presents a dilemma for the cardiac surgical care team, particularly after mitral and tricuspid valve surgery.The difficulty relates to several factors: first, ventricular pacing is frequently required following mitral and tricuspid valve surgery; secondly, during transgastric tee imaging, the severity of any inferior wall motion defect may be overestimated, limiting its specificity for ischemia detection; and lastly, the constellation of findings observed during this case are not uncommon following cardiac surgery and may present in many patients who suffer from only self-limited inferior wall motion abnormalities.Arrhythmias and conduction disturbances are common after surgical repair or replacement of the tricuspid and mitral valves due to the proximity of the conduction pathways.Ultimately, the patient recovered despite a prolonged hospitalization, mostly related to the management of atrial fibrillation and need for a pacemaker.A device history record (dhr) review could not be performed, as the serial # of the device was not provided.However, there is no information suggesting that there was a malfunction or deficiency of the edwards annuloplasty ring.If any new information is learned, a supplemental report will be submitted.No corrective action is applicable to this case.Edwards will continue to review and monitor all reported events.Trends are monitored on a monthly basis and if action is required, appropriate investigation will be performed.
 
Event Description
Edwards was informed of event through literature review of: "right coronary artery occlusion after tricuspid valve ring annuloplasty." author: j.Goldhammer, md, et al.Published on journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia, vol 29, no 6 (december), 2015: pp 1606-1609.An (b)(6) male with congestive heart failure was referred for surgical management of known severe mitral regurgitation (mr).Preoperative transesophageal echocardiography(tee) revealed severe left atrial enlargement, severe eccentric mr secondary to a flail p2-p3 scallop with annular dilation, left ventricular ejection fraction of 45%, tricuspid annular dilation with moderate central tricuspid regurgitation, and mild right ventricular dilation with preserved systolic function.Preoperative cardiac catheterization prior to surgery had identified diffuse non-critical coronary artery disease in a right dominant circulation and a 60% proximal right coronary artery stenosis.During preoperative surgical consultation, the patient expressed his desire to avoid median sternotomy, and a minimally invasive mitral and tricuspid valve repair was planned.A 30 mm carpentier edwards tricuspid annuloplasty band was selected the tricuspid valve repair.Prior to separation from cpb, tee imaging was notable for moderate left ventricular dysfunction, mild right ventricular dysfunction, trace residual mr, and no tricuspid regurgitation.Post-operatively, diagnostic images revealed a 100% occlusion of the distal right coronary artery directly abutting the tricuspid ring annuloplasty.Multiple attempts to pass a wire through the occlusion site proved unsuccessful, raising suspicion for a mechanical occlusion of the distal right coronary artery (rca).It was decided to transfer the patient back to the intensive care unit for conservative management of the distal rca occlusion and continued postoperative care.The postoperative course was complicated by continued third-degree heart block, ultimately requiring placement of a dual-chamber pacemaker and an episode of severe chest pain and atrial fibrillation on pod #8.Repeat coronary angiography performed following the onset of chest pain revealed stable coronary artery disease with persistent total occlusion of the distal rca.The patient was discharged on pod #15 to a short-term rehab facility.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
EDWARDS MC3 TRICUSPID ANNULOPLASTY SYSTEM
Type of Device
RING, ANNULOPLASTY
Manufacturer (Section D)
EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES
1 edwards way
irvine CA 92614
Manufacturer (Section G)
EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES LLC
1 edwards way
irvine CA 92614
Manufacturer Contact
neil landry
1 edwards way
ms: lfs 33
irvine, CA 92614
9492502289
MDR Report Key6008289
MDR Text Key56791680
Report Number2015691-2016-02966
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code KRH
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K020864
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type literature
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 09/15/2016
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model Number4900
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 09/15/2016
Initial Date FDA Received10/06/2016
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Treatment
DUAL-CHAMBER PACEMAKER
Patient Outcome(s) Hospitalization; Required Intervention;
Patient Age82 YR
-
-