The product identification necessary to review manufacturing history was not provided.Current information is insufficient to permit a conclusion as to the cause of the event.Event is being reported to fda on one medwatch since the limited information available indicates that a revision procedure may be necessary.Should additional information be received regarding a revision procedure, the complaint will be reassessed and, if warranted, further medwatch reports will be submitted.
|
This follow-up report is being submitted to relay additional information.Reported event was unable to be confirmed as lot number of device involved in the incident is unknown.Device history record (dhr) review was unable to be performed as the lot number of the device involved in the event is unknown.Review of the complaint history determined that no further action is required.It was relayed that an older version of the surgical technique was used; therefore, an expressbraid was not used in the surgery.This likely led to the failure of the device.Root cause determined to be incorrect surgical technique.A summary of the investigation was sent to the complainant conveying proper surgical technique and use of the device.If any further information is found which would change or alter any conclusions or information, a supplemental will be filed accordingly.Zimmer biomet will continue to monitor for trends.
|