• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: CYBERONICS, INC. PULSE GEN MODEL 106; GENERATOR

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

CYBERONICS, INC. PULSE GEN MODEL 106; GENERATOR Back to Search Results
Model Number 106
Device Problem Device Operates Differently Than Expected (2913)
Patient Problems Respiratory Distress (2045); Seizures (2063); Burning Sensation (2146); Dizziness (2194)
Event Date 09/21/2016
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).
 
Event Description
It was reported the patient was recently implanted with a new generator and he feels a burning sensation with magnet stimulation.There was no known trauma which could have caused or contributed to the burning sensation.It was mentioned that the physician should have the patient come in to have vns diagnostics checked.If everything was working as expected, the magnet settings could be adjusted to reduce the energy delivered.It was later reported the patient was seen on (b)(6) 2016 and the physician had adjusted his settings.The patient later called the physician's office complaining that he felt the vns turn on by itself several times, he felt dizzy, had shortness of breath, felt faint and would mumble after.He explained that he had 1 seizures on (b)(6) 2016 and 3 seizures at night on (b)(6) 2016.Attempts for additional relevant information have been unsuccessful to date.
 
Event Description
Additional information was received from one of the physician's offices and it was noted the patient had tried to swipe his magnet on (b)(6) 2016, but it did not work.Attempts for additional relevant information have been unsuccessful to date.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Date of event: this information was inadvertently left off of the initial mfr.Report.
 
Event Description
The physician's office later reported they had reached out to the patient and explained how the new vns device, which has autostimulation, worked.The patient stated he had not had any more issues with the device and now he knows it was just stimulating when he is having a seizure, and is not random.The patient is comfortable with the vns and believed it is working correctly and that he no longer feels he needs to have a physician look at the device at this time.The nurse confirmed that they do not feel there is anything wrong with the device and the symptoms he had were just stimulation related and he needed to acclimate to the new autostimulation.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
PULSE GEN MODEL 106
Type of Device
GENERATOR
Manufacturer (Section D)
CYBERONICS, INC.
100 cyberonics blvd
houston TX 77058
Manufacturer (Section G)
CYBERONICS, INC.
100 cyberonics blvd
suite 600
houston TX 77058
Manufacturer Contact
njemile crawley
100 cyberonics blvd
suite 600
houston, TX 77058
2812287200
MDR Report Key6030381
MDR Text Key57483659
Report Number1644487-2016-02371
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LYJ
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P970003
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,health
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 09/21/2016
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Lay User/Patient
Device Expiration Date09/10/2017
Device Model Number106
Device Lot Number4514
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Event Location Other
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 09/21/2016
Initial Date FDA Received10/14/2016
Supplement Dates Manufacturer ReceivedNot provided
Not provided
Supplement Dates FDA Received11/11/2016
12/06/2016
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured05/12/2016
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age48 YR
-
-