• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: CYBERONICS, INC. LEAD MODEL 302

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

CYBERONICS, INC. LEAD MODEL 302 Back to Search Results
Model Number 302-20
Device Problems Leak/Splash (1354); Material Protrusion/Extrusion (2979)
Patient Problems Purulent Discharge (1812); Undesired Nerve Stimulation (1980); Pain (1994)
Event Date 08/24/2016
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Suspect udi: (b)(4).
 
Event Description
Information was received indicating that the patient had voice alteration independent of stimulation.The surgeon indicated that the patient's nerve might have been cut during surgery on (b)(6) 2016.Stimulation was turned on (b)(6) 2016.Since then the patient's settings have been reduced to lower settings and autostim has been turned off for patient comfort.Diagnostics from (b)(6) 2016 were within normal limits.There was also report of drainage of pus at the neck incision site as well as pain.Blood tests were run and there was no sign of infection, but antibiotics were prescribed.The leakage increased when the patient laid down.In addition to the drainage at the neck site the generator was found to be protruding.There was also flushing and pain present around the generator site.No other relevant information has been received to date.
 
Event Description
X-rays were received to review if the patient had a lead fracture that might have been contributing to the reported events.The review found that the lead pin was properly inserted, adequate strain relief was present, and no gross fractures could be visualized.However the possibility of micro fractures that could not be visualized with naked eye were not ruled out.The patient's lead and generator were then explanted on (b)(6) 2016 and during the explant surgery it was discovered the patient had an infection despite having a negative cbc count.The infection appeared to be wide spread extending from the generator site to the lead site and causing the drainage at the electrode site.During surgery there was no nerve damage noted which the surgeon had mentioned as a possibility prior.The patient had antibiotics prescribed to treat the infection and had the entire vns system removed.The vns system was then discarded by the explanting facility.The surgeon and physician did not know what caused the infection.Patient behavior was discussed as a possibility but no conclusive decision was found.The device history record for the generator and lead were reviewed and both devices were found to be sterilized prior to shipment.The expiration dates were 01/18/2019 and 01/22/2017 for the lead and generator, respectively.No other relevant information has been received to date.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
LEAD MODEL 302
Type of Device
LEAD
Manufacturer (Section D)
CYBERONICS, INC.
100 cyberonics blvd
houston TX 77058
Manufacturer (Section G)
CYBERONICS, INC.
100 cyberonics blvd
suite 600
houston TX 77058
Manufacturer Contact
njemile crawley
100 cyberonics blvd
suite 600
houston, TX 77058
2812287200
MDR Report Key6031171
MDR Text Key57498902
Report Number1644487-2016-02355
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LYJ
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P970003
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,health
Reporter Occupation Health Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 09/21/2016
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Lay User/Patient
Device Expiration Date01/18/2019
Device Model Number302-20
Device Lot Number4217
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Event Location Other
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 09/21/2016
Initial Date FDA Received10/14/2016
Supplement Dates Manufacturer ReceivedNot provided
Supplement Dates FDA Received11/08/2016
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured06/16/2016
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Other; Required Intervention;
Patient Age44 YR
-
-