The pipeline flex has not been returned for evaluation.The device was not returned, therefore the reported event could not be confirmed.An event cause could not be conclusively determined from the reported information.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
|
The flow diverter and the catheter were returned for analysis.Approximately 0.5 cm of the flow diverter braid was found deployed outside of the catheter tip.The remaining braid and pushwire was found stuck inside the distal segment of the catheter.The flow diverter was pushed out of the catheter with difficulty.It appeared that the pushwire detached at the hypotube, proximal to the wire weld.The distal and proximal dps restraints were found intact.The dps sleeves were also found intact with no signs of damage.The distal hypotube appeared to be stretched with the ptfe shrink tubing still intact.The distal end of the flow diverter braid was found fully opened with slightly frayed; while the proximal end of the braid was found fully opened with no damage.Kinks and bends were found on the pushwire at the proximal end.No defects were found with the tip coil, distal marker, re-sheathing marker or with the proximal bumper.No other anomalies were observed.The surfaces (1 and 2) of the detached pushwire were then sent out for sem and eds analyses.Based on the reported event details, the analysis findings and the sem/eds analyses, the customer's report of ¿pushwire detach at hypotube proximal to the wire weld¿ was confirmed.The distal wire of the pipeline flex delivery system was possibly detached due to tensile failure.The damages seen on the returned catheter body (accordioning), proximal wire (kinking/bending) and hypotube (stretching); it appears there was excessive forced used (pushing and pulling.The elemental analysis conducted through scanning electron micrographic (sem) / energy dispersive spectroscopy (eds) showed presence of soldering material (tin); thereby indicating that the soldering was conducted.Additionally, the proof load of 2.5n performed on 100% of the devices (section starting with hypotube solder to distal pad solder joint).Design verification results showed that all the solder joints meet product specifications whereas existing process verification ensured that solder joints leaving the production line met product specification requirements.No evidence was found to suggest that the device failed to meet specifications.The lot history record of the reported lot number has been reviewed.The lot history record showed no discrepancies that would have contributed to the reported experience.Per our instructions for use: "discontinue delivery of the device if high force or excessive friction is encountered.Identify the cause of the resistance and remove device and microcatheter simultaneously.Advancement of the ped against resistance may result in device damage or patient injury.Never advance or withdraw an intraluminal device against resistance until the cause of resistance is determined by fluoroscopy.If the cause cannot be determined, withdraw the catheter.Movement of the micro catheter against resistance may result in damage to the micro catheter, or the vessel.¿ all products are 100% inspected for damage and irregularities during manufacture.
|