• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS INCORPORATED DIAMONDBACK 360 PERIPHERAL ORBITAL ATHERECTOMY SYSTEM; PERIPHERAL ATHERECTOMY DEVICE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS INCORPORATED DIAMONDBACK 360 PERIPHERAL ORBITAL ATHERECTOMY SYSTEM; PERIPHERAL ATHERECTOMY DEVICE Back to Search Results
Model Number DBP-125MICRO145
Device Problem Device Operates Differently Than Expected (2913)
Patient Problem Vascular Dissection (3160)
Event Date 09/19/2016
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Device analysis: the oad was received without the original guide wire.The initial visual and tactile examination revealed a kink in the driveshaft 18.5cm distal to the nose cone.It could not be determined whether or not the damage occurred during the procedure or as a result of being returned to csi without the protective tray.Further examination revealed that the crown and distal tip bushing remained intact and undamaged.Biological material was observed on the driveshaft and crown.Examination in the area of the adhered tissue did not reveal any damage that would have contributed to the accumulation.The outside diameter (od) of the crown was measured using a calibrated dial caliper and met the drawing specification.The placement of the crown and driveshaft dimensions also met the drawing specifications.An in-house 0.014" wire was loaded through the driveshaft, but met resistance at the location of the driveshaft kink.The kink was destructively removed to allow for functional testing.The guide wire was then loaded through the handle assembly without resistance.When the device was powered on, the led's on the handle assembly illuminated and defaulted to the low speed led as expected.When tested on low speed using a test fixture, the device was unable to reach 60k rpms and only reached 35k rpms.The device was then tested at medium and at high speed and would not exceed 35k rpms.Additional electrical analysis revealed that the device was continuously drawing the maximum current limit, but the speed would not exceed 35k rpms.At the conclusion of the failure analysis investigation, the motor was observed to only operate at 35k rpms, but the root cause could not be conclusively determined.The motor has been sent to the vendor for additional electrical analysis.The root cause of the dissection also could not be determined.Additionally, it could not be determined whether or not the oad motor operating at a lower rpm was related to the dissection.A driveshaft that cannot get to speed results in a delay of therapy.The device history record for this oad lot number has been reviewed.No issues or discrepancies were noted during this review that would have contributed to the reported event.The device met material, assembly, and quality control requirements.(b)(4).
 
Event Description
It was reported that during a peripheral orbital atherectomy procedure, a dissection occurred while using a csi orbital atherectomy device (oad).The target lesion was 14cm in length, 99% stenotic, and was located in the superficial femoral artery (sfa).The physician used a 6fr introducer sheath and 6fr ansel guide catheter to access the lesion.The physician advanced a csi viperwire guide wire across the lesion and the oad was loaded onto it.The physician successfully completed two runs at low speed and two runs at medium speed.During the next run at high speed, the device did not sound as if it were reaching the appropriate rpms.The physician was able to complete the final run at high speed; however, the oad sounded as if it were spinning at lower rpms.The device was removed from the patient and angiography revealed a dissection.The physician deployed a 6mm balloon and 6mm stent to resolve the dissection.The patient left the procedure in stable condition.Three requests for additional information have been made, but none has yet been received.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
DIAMONDBACK 360 PERIPHERAL ORBITAL ATHERECTOMY SYSTEM
Type of Device
PERIPHERAL ATHERECTOMY DEVICE
Manufacturer (Section D)
CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS INCORPORATED
1225 old highway 8 nw
saint paul MN 55112
Manufacturer (Section G)
CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS INCORPORATED
1225 old highway 8 nw
saint paul MN 55112
Manufacturer Contact
jacob mellem
1225 old hwy 8 nw
saint paul, MN 55112
6512592819
MDR Report Key6042079
MDR Text Key57917343
Report Number3004742232-2016-00116
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code MCW
UDI-Device Identifier10852528005282
UDI-Public(01)10852528005282(17)180531(10)162407
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K133399
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 10/11/2016
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Physician
Device Expiration Date05/31/2018
Device Model NumberDBP-125MICRO145
Device Catalogue NumberDBP-125MICRO145
Device Lot Number162407
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer09/26/2016
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 09/19/2016
Initial Date FDA Received10/19/2016
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured05/27/2016
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Life Threatening; Required Intervention;
-
-