• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: SHENZHEN DONGDIXIN TECHNOLOGY CO, LTD. QUATTRO 2.5; TENS UNIT

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

SHENZHEN DONGDIXIN TECHNOLOGY CO, LTD. QUATTRO 2.5; TENS UNIT Back to Search Results
Model Number DQ8450
Device Problems Electrical /Electronic Property Problem (1198); Device Issue (2379); Output Problem (3005)
Patient Problem Burn(s) (1757)
Event Date 09/14/2016
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
The distributor states that their patient was burned during use of the tens unit.According to the compass health brands customer service representative, this call was very confusing - there was little information to provide, and the person the representative had spoken to's story changed a couple of times; he seemed unsure of himself.The representative did not believe that the person (he) knew the answers to the questions the rep was asking, and felt he was guessing in response to some questions asked.The person the representative had spoken to while obtaining some answers to some questions states he was a physical therapist - however, he was not the pt in the room when the patient was burned - he stated that this therapist is no longer with the clinic.The representative asked what waveform had been used on the end-user, but the person asking the questions is reported as not having understood the word waveform - the representative reviewed all the waveforms, and chose ems - he later stated that they use the waveform that comes up when they power the device on, he thought if-4p.He was unclear of the end-user's age, and guessed (b)(6).The burn happened at the therapist's office while the pt was in the room with the end-user.He stated immediately the end-user felt shocking, and when the electrodes were removed, a burn mark was evident.He states the electrodes were placed 1" to 6" apart on the user's lower back.They were using 2x2 electrodes.The end-user did seek medical treatment, but the pt does not have any records from that treatment.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
QUATTRO 2.5
Type of Device
TENS UNIT
Manufacturer (Section D)
SHENZHEN DONGDIXIN TECHNOLOGY CO, LTD.
no. 3 building xilibaimang xus
industrial estate nanshan
shenzhen guangdong, china 51810 8
CH  518108
MDR Report Key6042756
MDR Text Key57918167
Report Number3005182235-2016-00036
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code GZJ
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Distributor
Reporter Occupation Physical Therapist
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 10/19/2016
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Physical Therapist
Device Model NumberDQ8450
Device Catalogue NumberDQ8450
Device Lot NumberN/A
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Yes
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? Yes
Date Report Sent to FDA10/19/2016
Distributor Facility Aware Date09/28/2016
Device Age9 MO
Event Location Outpatient Treatment Facility
Date Report to Manufacturer10/19/2016
Initial Date Manufacturer Received Not provided
Initial Date FDA Received10/19/2016
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage N
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age35 YR
-
-