The lot number was provided.A review of the approved device history records indicated the lot met all release criteria.The device was returned to the manufacturer for evaluation.The implant coil was not attached to the delivery pusher.Visual inspection revealed the pusher body coil was normal and the heater coil was compressed.The monofilament that holds the implant to the delivery pusher had evidence of stretching.Based on the product evaluation and the reported complaint details, the root cause could not be determined; however, the condition of the returned device is consistent with the device being exposed to a force that exceeded the maximum tensile specification.(b)(4).
|