• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: LIVANOVA USA, INC. LEAD MODEL 302

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

LIVANOVA USA, INC. LEAD MODEL 302 Back to Search Results
Model Number 302-20
Device Problems High impedance (1291); Unexpected Therapeutic Results (1631)
Patient Problem Seizures (2063)
Event Date 08/01/2016
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
Suspect device udi#: (b)(4).
 
Event Description
It was reported by the physician that the patient's vns showed high impedance.Additionally, it was noted the patient recently had an increase in seizures, which was attributed to the high impedance observed.All of the output currents on the device were programmed off.The patient had x-rays performed; however, based on the images, the cause of the high impedance could not be determined.The patient was referred for vns replacement; however, no known surgical interventions have occurred to date.
 
Event Description
The patient underwent lead revision surgery on (b)(6) due to high impedance.It was noted the physician did attempt multiple pin re-insertions prior to replacing the lead, but the high impedance still existed.After the lead was replaced, the physician obtained good diagnostics of 2038 ohms, which was within normal limits.The explanted lead was received by the manufacturer for analysis.Product analysis is expected, but has not been completed to date.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Brand name; corrected data, type of device; corrected data, model#, serial#, lot#, exp date; corrected data, device manufacture date; corrected data: this information was inadvertently left off of the supplemental #01 mfr.Report.
 
Event Description
Product analysis (pa) for the returned lead was completed.The reported high impedance was verified in the pa lab as a coil break was identified in the positive coil.Scanning electron microscopy images of the positive coil showed pitting or electro-etching conditions have occurred at the break location.Due to the pitting and metal dissolution, the fracture mechanism could not be determined on that specific coil end.Scanning electron microscopy images of the positive coil suspected broken mate-end suggested a stress-induced fracture.The allegation of the patient¿s increased seizures is beyond the scope of the pa lab; however, the confirmed high impedance may have been a contributing factor.It should also be noted that during the visual analysis of the lead, punctures and abrasions were observed on the inner silicon tubing of the lead.The abrasions and punctures appeared to be located at the same position as the coil break.Other than the previously mentioned coil break and typical wear and explant related observations, no other anomalies were identified in the returned portion of the lead.
 
Event Description
Product analysis was performed on the returned generator and found the first noted instance of high impedance was seen to have occurred on (b)(6) 2016.No other issues on the generator were seen.No additional relevant information has been received to date.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
LEAD MODEL 302
Type of Device
LEAD
Manufacturer (Section D)
LIVANOVA USA, INC.
100 cyberonics blvd
houston TX 77058
Manufacturer (Section G)
LIVANOVA USA, INC.
100 cyberonics blvd
suite 600
houston TX 77058
Manufacturer Contact
rachel kohn
100 cyberonics blvd
suite 600
houston, TX 77058
2812287200
MDR Report Key6051453
MDR Text Key58524832
Report Number1644487-2016-02450
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LYJ
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P970003
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,health
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup,Followup
Report Date 10/23/2019
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Lay User/Patient
Device Expiration Date05/31/2008
Device Model Number302-20
Device Lot Number1095
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer11/17/2016
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Event Location Other
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 09/29/2016
Initial Date FDA Received10/24/2016
Supplement Dates Manufacturer ReceivedNot provided
Not provided
10/01/2019
Supplement Dates FDA Received12/06/2016
12/14/2016
10/23/2019
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured05/14/2005
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age39 YR
-
-