Catalog Number H96560M7801291 |
Device Problems
Material Fragmentation (1261); Uncoiled (1659)
|
Patient Problem
Foreign Body In Patient (2687)
|
Event Date 06/07/2016 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
The guidewire from the reported event is expected to be returned to (b)(4), but has not yet arrived.Upon receipt of the sample, it will be forwarded to our supplier, (b)(4), along with a supplier corrective action request (scar).At the completion of the investigation, a supplemental medwatch will be submitted.(b)(4).Device not yet returned to manufacturer.
|
|
Event Description
|
As reported, "the guidewire had a slight bent to the tip but fed easily through the needle and into the vein, as we advanced wire, easily, further up the vessel the wire met resistance, tried to pull wire back but it snagged, tried to pull needle and wire out together, needle removed easily but end of wire was kinked and curled under the skin (as seen on fluoro) as we tried to gently pull the wire out, the floppy end began to separate from the inner wire and uncoil into a thin thread that had to be cut out of the pt's arm.Post fluoro did reveal that no segments were left in the arm." the used guidewire will be returned for evaluation.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
A review of the device history records was performed for the indicated packaging and component lots for any deviations related to the reported defect of the complaint.The review confirms that the lots met all material, assembly and performance specifications.The october 2016 angiodynamics complaint report was reviewed for the vaxcel pasv picc product family for the failure mode "guidewire fractured." no adverse trend was identified.The used guidewire was returned in its protective hoop and was in one piece, but the end was unraveled.As this is a purchased component for angiodynamics, the sample was forwarded to our supplier, (b)(4), for evaluation and completion of a supplier corrective action request (scar).After evaluating the returned wire, (b)(4) determined that there did not appear to be any material missing.The damage presented by the sample appeared consistent with the device having been advanced against resistance as described in the complaint narrative into a constraint condition, and sustaining the fracture and stretch damage during subsequent manipulation.It was not possible to assign a definitive root cause for the event reported.Based on the evidence presented by the sample and the information provided by the supporting documentation [statement from end user that they pulled the guidewire back and it snagged - while it was in the needle], clinical and/or procedural factors appear to have impacted on the event as reported.The directions for use (dfu) provided with the picc device includes the following: "precaution: if guidewire must be withdrawn, remove the needle and guidewire as a single unit." (b)(4).
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|