• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: CYBERONICS, INC. LEAD MODEL 302

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

CYBERONICS, INC. LEAD MODEL 302 Back to Search Results
Model Number 302-20
Device Problems Fracture (1260); High impedance (1291); Low Battery (2584); Communication or Transmission Problem (2896); Device Operates Differently Than Expected (2913)
Patient Problems Emotional Changes (1831); Depression (2361); No Code Available (3191)
Event Date 10/04/2016
Event Type  malfunction  
Event Description
It was reported that the patient underwent generator replacement surgery due to an end of service generator.Prior to surgery the generator could not be communicated with due to battery depletion.During surgery the generator was replaced and high impedance was observed with the existing lead and the new generator.Pin insertion troubleshooting was then attempted.The surgeon reinserted the existing lead's pin into the new generator multiple times however the high impedance did not resolve.He then performed a generator diagnostic test on the new generator and a test resistor which showed that the generator was functioning properly.The existing lead was then reinserted into the new generator and high impedance was once again observed.The surgeon then decided to replace the lead at a later surgery.The generator was then programmed on because the surgeon felt that even if the patient was not receiving therapy due to the high impedance she would at least benefit from a placebo effect from knowing the device was on.It was reported that x-rays were taken pre-operatively and the physician did not observe a lead issue however these x-rays have not been received by the manufacturer.The psychiatrist was then informed of the manufacturer's recommendations to program the device off if high impedance is seen.However it is unknown if the psychiatrist did program the device off.Later the patient reported that she needed the lead replaced because she was very depressed and made suicidal statements.No surgical interventions are known to have occurred to date.No additional relevant information has been received to date.
 
Event Description
It was reported that the patient underwent surgery to address the high impedance.During the surgery the surgeon attempted to re-insert the lead pin into the generator to determine if inadequate pin insertion was the cause of the high impedance.However the high impedance did not resolve and the surgeon proceeded with a lead replacement.A diagnostic test at the end of the surgery confirmed that the existing generator and new lead were functioning properly.The explanted lead has not been received to date.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
LEAD MODEL 302
Type of Device
LEAD
Manufacturer (Section D)
CYBERONICS, INC.
100 cyberonics blvd
houston TX 77058
Manufacturer (Section G)
CYBERONICS, INC.
100 cyberonics blvd
suite 600
houston TX 77058
Manufacturer Contact
njemile crawley
100 cyberonics blvd
suite 600
houston, TX 77058
2812287200
MDR Report Key6060435
MDR Text Key58713096
Report Number1644487-2016-02487
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code MUZ
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P970003
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,health
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 01/02/2017
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Lay User/Patient
Device Expiration Date01/31/2009
Device Model Number302-20
Device Lot Number1538
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Event Location Other
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 10/04/2016
Initial Date FDA Received10/27/2016
Supplement Dates Manufacturer ReceivedNot provided
Supplement Dates FDA Received01/02/2017
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured01/20/2006
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Other;
Patient Age52 YR
-
-