Model Number 106 |
Device Problem
Insufficient Information (3190)
|
Patient Problems
Abscess (1690); Local Reaction (2035); Pressure Sores (2326)
|
Event Date 09/26/2016 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Suspect device udi: (b)(4).
|
|
Event Description
|
Patient went to er over (b)(6) 2016 weekend.Per er physician, vns site was abscessed and so patient is contacting the surgeon.Per the nurse who reported the event, patient stated it felt sore on (b)(6) 2016 and that chiropractor thought he may have tore something.A few weeks later, patient stated they did x-ray and thought it was abscessed.A review of device history records showed that both the lead and generator were sterilized prior to distribution.No additional relevant information has been received to date.
|
|
Event Description
|
Additional information was received regarding the abscess.On (b)(6) 2016, patient was seen by the surgeon, who noted that there was possible abscess near vns lead.Patient developed a small nodule at the lateral edge of his neck incision where the vns lead coursed.Patient was provided clindamycin previously.Physical examination of the neck revealed a quarter centimeter granulomatous nodule in the lateral edge of his transverse neck incision which was consistent with a pyogenicum granuloma.This was debrided with a pair of scissors then cauterized with silver nitrate.On (b)(6) 2016, the surgeon noted that there is a 2 mm bud of granulation tissue that was debrided this was again silver nitrated.On (b)(6) 2016, it was noted that there is a 3 mm of granulated tissue that is flush with the skin at the left chest.The physician cauterized with silver nitrate.On (b)(6) 2016, patient developed a small pyoderma on the lateral aspect of his neck wound.A 3 mm granuloma was cauterized with silver nitrate.It was noted to be improving.The granuloma was reported to be due to infection.On (b)(6) 2016, patient had half a centimeter by 3 mm area of redness along with the granulomatous nodule.The physician planned to place patient on bactrim ds and to excise the granuloma.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Device evaluated by mfr: device evaluation is not necessary as a site reaction is not related to the functionality or delivery of therapy of the device.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that the patient had had his granuloma excised on his left neck in (b)(6) 2017, because they believed it may have been an abscess.However, the cultures came back negative for an infection.In (b)(6) 2017, the patient again came into the office to have an excision of his granuloma and again the cultures came back negative for infection.It late april they could see the lead extruding from the neck, so the patient underwent full explant.The surgeon did not know what caused the granuloma.No further relevant information has been received, to date.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|