Catalog Number 1020-5207 |
Device Problems
Break (1069); Fracture (1260); Material Integrity Problem (2978); Insufficient Information (3190)
|
Patient Problems
No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199); No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
|
Event Date 10/05/2016 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Additional information has been requested and if received, will be provided in the supplemental report.Not returned to manufacturer.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that the item broke at the socket.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
An event regarding crack/fracture involving a accolade broach was reported.The event was not confirmed.Method & results: -device evaluation and results: a visual, functional and dimensional inspection could not be performed as the device was not returned.-medical records received and evaluation: not performed as medical records were not received and patient factors didn't contribute to the event.-device history review: review of the device history records indicates devices were manufactured and accepted into final stock with no reported discrepancies.-complaint history review: there have been no other events for this lot.Conclusions: the event could not be confirmed nor the root cause could be determined because the device was not returned for evaluation and insufficient medical information was provided.If the devices and/or additional information are received, this investigation will be reopened and re-evaluated.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that the item broke at the socket.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Product available to stryker/returned to manufacturer on an event regarding crack/fracture involving a accolade broach was reported.The event was confirmed.The device was returned in used condition.Visual inspection of the returned device shows that it was fractured at the trunnion.Review of returned device by material analysis engineer indicated "the locking mechanism fractured in overload.No material or manufacturing defects were observed on the surfaces examined.¿ medical records received and evaluation: not performed as patient factors did not contribute to the event.Device history review indicated the devices accepted into final stock from the reported lot were free from discrepancies.Complaint history review: there has been no other event for the lot referenced.The event was confirmed as per visual inspection of the returned device which shows that device was fractured at the trunnion.The returned device was consulted with material analysis engineer who indicated that the locking mechanism fractured in overload.No material or manufacturing defects were observed on the surfaces examined.No further investigation is possible at this time.If the additional information will be received, this investigation will be reopened and re-evaluated.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that the item broke at the socket.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|