The customer's lawyer filed a lawsuit alleging that the coaguchek meter (serial number not provided) produced "false and inaccurate" inr results causing her "irreversible and severe injuries." the lawsuit states that "at all relevant times" the coaguchek meter produced results within the customer's therapeutic range.The customer's therapeutic range was not provided.Specific meter results and actions taken based on the meter were not provided.The only information roche has concerning this incident is from the lawsuit.The customer did not contact roche with this complaint.Roche has no further information related to this incident.The lawsuit states that around (b)(6) 2015 the customer started to have severe headaches.On approximately (b)(6) 2015 the customer suffered "multiple injuries" including a seizure and a subdural hematoma.On (b)(6) 2015 the customer underwent an emergency craniotomy to treat the "life-threatening subdural hematoma." the lawsuit states that the customer has had complications on a daily or persistent basis after the subdural hematoma of "aphasia, facial droop, severe headaches, double vision or blurry vision, gastrointestinal bleeding, uncontrollable shaking, difficulty with motor skills, cognitive dysfunction and undesirable side effects of multiple forms of medications to treat these issues." the customer's lawyer states that since the customer relied on the "false and inaccurate" results from the coaguchek meter, this prevented her from taking necessary actions to control her inr results.The lawsuit states that if the coaguchek meter had "safely and reliably" measured the customer's inr, the customer could have made medication adjustments to prevent the "severe injuries and irreversible harm." the lawsuit states that the customer's doctors "determined that the seizure and subdural hematoma were caused by over-coagulation of her blood." since the customer has not contacted roche directly, and we only have the city and state where she resides, we are not able to request the suspect product for return.No product is expected for return to complete the investigation.
|
The customer returned the meter and test strips.The test strips were expired and could not be tested.The coaguchek xs meter serial number was (b)(4).Lot number and expiration date were updated.The returned meter was tested in comparison to a retention meter and master lot strips.Human blood samples from warfarin donors were used.Donor 1 inr: 2.2 inr , donor 2 inr: 3.2 inr.Donor 1 hct: 47% , donor 2 hct: 54%.Donor 1: retention meter with master lot strips: 2.2 inr, customer meter with master lot strips: 2.2 inr.Donor 2: retention meter with master lot strips: 3.1 inr , customer meter with master lot strips: 3.1 inr.All inr values were within the specified maximum difference between measurements.No error messages occurred.The returned material and the retention material meet the specifications.The customer's returned meter was additionally tested with controls: qc 1: 2.6 inr , qc 2: 2.6 inr.The obtained qc values were in the allowed range of the used combination master lot strip lot - qc lot.(2.2 - 3.4 inr).All measurements were obtained without error messages.The investigation was unable to find a definitive root cause for this event.
|