• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: CYBERONICS, INC. PULSE GEN MODEL 103; GENERATOR

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

CYBERONICS, INC. PULSE GEN MODEL 103; GENERATOR Back to Search Results
Model Number 103
Device Problems Unexpected Therapeutic Results (1631); Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Patient Problems Seizures (2063); Therapeutic Effects, Unexpected (2099); Vomiting (2144); Therapeutic Response, Decreased (2271)
Event Date 04/13/2016
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
 
Event Description
It was reported to a case manager (b)(6) 2016 by a patient's caregiver that the patient was having problems with tolerance of stimulation settings in excess of 0.75 ma.She describes increased patient agitation as well as marked increase in seizures with each attempt to advance stimulation strength to 1.25 ma.The caregiver also was concerned about a change in seizures with onset of approx.6 months prior.She reported onset of monthly seizures the first of every month, characterized by emesis after seizure activity.The increase in seizures were reported to be worse than the patient's pre-vns baseline.The device settings were adjusted.Additional relevant information has not been received to-date.
 
Event Description
Follow-up from the treating physician provided that although the caregiver believes the increase in seizures is due to vns, the physician does not.The increase in seizures at higher settings of 1.25ma was not worse than before the patient had vns.The increase in seizures at settings of 0.75ma was not worse than before the patient had vns.Device diagnostics were provided and were within normal limits on (b)(6) 2016.Notes from (b)(6) 2016 received provided that the caregiver says when she does use the magnet during the seizure it seems like it makes the seizure worse.The patient¿s vns was decreased to 0.75 on (b)(6) 2016 due to agitation, since then she remained seizure free for 12 days until having a seizure.It was reported that in april behavioral problems of rage, biting, yelling and fussy were present.Average seizures still remains once a week.It was reported the patient wants to be off on vns.The vns was reduced from 0.75ma to 0.5 ma, and then was planned to be reduced to 0.25 ma and then turn it off.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Date of this report, corrected data: the date of the report submission for follow-up report #1 was inadvertently provided as 11/01/2016, and was intended to be 01/05/2017.Date received by manufacturer, corrected data: the date the information was received by the manufacturer for follow-up report #1 was inadvertently provided as 12/09/2016, and was intended to be 12/08/2017.
 
Event Description
Further follow-up from the physician provided that the magnet mode was not making the seizures worse.
 
Event Description
Follow-up from the physician provided that the patient¿s device had been turned off on (b)(6) 2016.The patient is reported to have psych issues and the device was turned off to appease her even though the physician doesn't feel that her recent problems are related to vns.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
PULSE GEN MODEL 103
Type of Device
GENERATOR
Manufacturer (Section D)
CYBERONICS, INC.
100 cyberonics blvd
houston TX 77058
Manufacturer (Section G)
CYBERONICS, INC.
100 cyberonics blvd
suite 600
houston TX 77058
Manufacturer Contact
njemile crawley
100 cyberonics blvd
suite 600
houston, TX 77058
2812287200
MDR Report Key6071002
MDR Text Key58918578
Report Number1644487-2016-02539
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LYJ
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P970003
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,consum
Reporter Occupation Patient Family Member or Friend
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup,Followup
Report Date 03/28/2017
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Lay User/Patient
Device Expiration Date02/29/2016
Device Model Number103
Device Lot Number3886
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Event Location Other
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 10/13/2016
Initial Date FDA Received11/01/2016
Supplement Dates Manufacturer ReceivedNot provided
Not provided
Not provided
Supplement Dates FDA Received01/05/2017
01/23/2017
03/28/2017
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured03/13/2014
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age30 YR
-
-