(b)(4).The results of the investigation are inconclusive since the device was not returned for analysis.Our investigation was limited to the review of the device history record, which showed that each manufacturing and inspection operation was performed and indicated complete in accordance with sjm specifications and procedures.Based on the information received, the cause of the reported incident could not be conclusively determined.
|
A 16 mm amplatzer septal occluder (aso) was deployed using an 8f amplatzer torqvue 45 delivery system (dtv45) however; as the disc edge pressed the posterior wall of the aorta the device was removed.A 14 mm aso was then attempted to be deployed and per report once again, the disc edge pressed the posterior wall of the aorta, so it was removed.Next, a 13 mm aso was successfully implanted and the position was confirmed prior to release of the aso from the delivery cable.After release, the aso once again, appeared too close to the posterior wall of the aorta and the device was attempted to be removed percutaneously using a 9f dtv45 and a 10 mm gooseneck snare.During snaring, the aso became hung up at the distal tip of the 9f dtv45 sheath and was unable to be pulled into the delivery sheath.The 9f dtv45 and the gooseneck snare were removed from the patient without consequences and the 9f dtv45 was replaced with a 10f dtv45.The same gooseneck snare was delivered through the 10f dtv45 delivery sheath and after several attempts to retrieve the aso, the device embolized to the left ventricle.Surgical intervention was required for the retrieval of the aso and the defect was closed with a pericardial patch.The patient is reported to be in stable condition.
|