Patient initially implanted with a bifurcated stent and a suprarenal aortic extension on (b)(6) 2013.On (b)(6) 2016 computed tomography (ct) showed stent fabric on proximal extension and main body stretched past device specifications, a decrease in overlap of the main body and proximal extension, and sac growth with no observed endoleak.The physician elected to reline on (b)(6) 2016 and implanted an additional bifurcated stent and two suprarenal aortic extensions.The patient is stable.
|
At the completion of the clinical evaluation, based on the information received the following were confirmed; dilation of the suprarenal cuff resulting in an endoleak type iiib, increased sac growth, and stable patient condition.Additionally there was evidence to reasonably support the following observations; endoleak type iiia and complete component separation, placement of a non-endologix in the left external iliac due to mild stenosis, 50% collapse of the proximal portion of the main body stent, and suboptimal position of the suprarenal cuff.The clinical assessment was based on adequate patient medical records, and adequate patient images.Based on the information available the root cause of the reported event is unknown.Devices was not returned and sample evaluation was not completed.Clinical found evidence to reasonably suggest the following contributing factors to the reported event; off label use, extensive stent ballooning, and dilation of the suprarenal stent.
|