• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: TERUMO CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEM CORP. LARGE (6) ROLLER PUMP FOR TERUMO ADVANCED PERFUSION SYSTEM 1; PUMP, BLOOD, CARDIOPULMONARY BYPASS, ROLLER TYPE ¿ 6 INCH ROLLER PUMP FOR APS 1

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

TERUMO CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEM CORP. LARGE (6) ROLLER PUMP FOR TERUMO ADVANCED PERFUSION SYSTEM 1; PUMP, BLOOD, CARDIOPULMONARY BYPASS, ROLLER TYPE ¿ 6 INCH ROLLER PUMP FOR APS 1 Back to Search Results
Model Number 801041
Device Problems Inaccurate Flow Rate (1249); Device Displays Incorrect Message (2591)
Patient Problem No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
Event Date 10/12/2016
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).Evaluation is in progress, but not yet concluded.
 
Event Description
It was reported that during cardiopulmonary bypass procedure, there was a roller pump belt slip error and the flow rate is higher than what is displayed.The alarm went off twice.The surgical procedure was completed successfully.There was no delay, no blood loss, nor adverse consequences to the patient.Per clinical review: 28-oct-2016: the responsible perfusionist during the procedure responded.Shortly after initiating cpb, the calculated flow rate on the arterial roller pump dropped to about 3.0 l/min, but according to the perfusionist the pump was visibly running at a higher flow rate and other indicators such as patient arterial pressure and arterial line circuit pressure indicated a higher than 3.0 l/min flow.In addition, during this period, the message beltslip was flashing on the local pump display.The perfusionist attempted to correct the issue by decreasing and increasing the pump speed but the behavior continued for about 30 seconds.After about 30 seconds, the beltslip message disappeared and the pump behaved per usual case.There were no mitigations to address the behavior and the pump was used without issue for the rest of the case.It was debated the occlusion may have been tight, but according to the perfusion team the occlusion was set per their normal practice.The occlusion was set by pressure decay method and the pressure dropped 1 mmhg / second at a circuit pressure of 200 - 200 mmhg.This method requires that during prime, the arterial line pressure is raised by clamping the tubing and raising the pressure to a range of 200 - 220 mmhg.The pump is stopped and the occlusion is adjusted for the above mentioned drop.This method of setting occlusion is not described in the aps-1 operator manual and has not been tested or validated at terumo.Some users do and have used this method (pressure decay) for setting occlusion, but they develop their own procedure.As i have heard from other users that practice this procedure, the 1mmhg drop per second is tighter than most utilize.In my clinical opinion, as the pump was used to complete the procedure without issue (after the first seconds) and beltslip was displayed.This pump behaved like it was over occluded and after the tubing was warmed up the behavior corrected itself.The procedure was completed successfully, without delay and without associated blood loss and no harm was observed.The pump is being returned and will be evaluated in (b)(4) lab.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
During laboratory analysis, the product surveillance technician (pst) observed an error message "underspeed" then 'belt slip" message began to appear on pump display only when pump occlusion was adjusted to 70 clicks past optimal occlusion.The pst tested the pump for belt slip error condition with pump jam test fixture and observed pump to generate expected results.If additional information becomes available on this complaint that would alter the facts and/or conclusion, a supplemental report will be filed accordingly.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Per data logs analysis, on (b)(6) 2016 the large roller pump reported underspeed (belt slip) twice as reported.If additional information becomes available on this complaint that would alter the facts and/or conclusion, a supplemental report will be filed accordingly.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The reported complaint was confirmed.The service repair technician (srt) could not duplicate the reported complaint.If additional information becomes available on this complaint that would alter the facts and/or conclusion, a supplemental report will be filed accordingly.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The manufacturer's clinical services provided he provided proper instructions on how to use the product to the user.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
LARGE (6) ROLLER PUMP FOR TERUMO ADVANCED PERFUSION SYSTEM 1
Type of Device
PUMP, BLOOD, CARDIOPULMONARY BYPASS, ROLLER TYPE ¿ 6 INCH ROLLER PUMP FOR APS 1
Manufacturer (Section D)
TERUMO CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEM CORP.
6200 jackson road
ann arbor MI 48103
Manufacturer Contact
eileen dorsey
6200 jackson road
ann arbor, MI 48103
7347416074
MDR Report Key6081046
MDR Text Key59563608
Report Number1828100-2016-00714
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code DWB
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K131618
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type health professional,user faci
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup,Followup,Followup
Report Date 10/02/2017
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model Number801041
Device Catalogue Number801041
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer10/20/2016
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 10/13/2016
Initial Date FDA Received11/07/2016
Supplement Dates Manufacturer ReceivedNot provided
Not provided
Not provided
06/08/2017
09/29/2017
Supplement Dates FDA Received12/09/2016
01/27/2017
02/24/2017
06/30/2017
10/02/2017
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured10/23/2003
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Reuse
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-