• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: J.T. POSEY POSEY BED 8070; PATIENT BED WITH CANOPY/RESTRAINTS

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

J.T. POSEY POSEY BED 8070; PATIENT BED WITH CANOPY/RESTRAINTS Back to Search Results
Model Number 8070
Device Problem Break (1069)
Patient Problem No Patient Involvement (2645)
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
Evaluation of the returned bed confirmed that one tooth from the right side panel was missing in addition to a 1 inch tear on the left side netting.All the issues listed were repaired and returned back to the customer for use.Posey beds are multi-use, serviceable items.As such, it is anticipated that the units may occasionally require repair, and as part of standard care the beds should be inspected prior to use.If damage is noted during these routine bed inspections, the unit should not put into use with a patient and should be returned to posey for servicing.If one zipper element is missing it can potentially leave an unsecured area.Applying pressure directly to the unsecured area will reveal the breach, which is why the user manual advises caregivers to apply direct pressure along the entire length of the zipper.If there are more than one consecutive zipper elements are missing it will not allow the zipper to be closed and will render the bed unusable.In order for a missing zipper element to potentially contribute to patient egress, the following must occur: the missing zipper element is not noticed, the caregiver does not properly check the zipper prior to leaving the patient unattended, and the patient identifies the unsecured area and exits the bed.Following the ifu and standard servicing protocols, the user can identify these issues prior to use and return the bed for repair.In this case, there was no impact or consequence to the patient and the canopy was returned for servicing when the zipper issues were identified.Although it cannot be confirmed, it is possible that routine wear-and-tear from repeated use contributed to the missing zipper element.Of note, the canopy was 13 months old since its last service.Service issues are trended and reviewed by management on a monthly basis.As part of this monthly review, spikes, trends and excursions above control limits will be assessed, documented and acted upon as warranted.No corrective or preventative actions are necessary at this time.Manufacturer reference file: (b)(4).
 
Event Description
Customer reported the slider and zipper teeth were damaged to the zipper located at the foot access panel.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
POSEY BED 8070
Type of Device
PATIENT BED WITH CANOPY/RESTRAINTS
Manufacturer (Section D)
J.T. POSEY
5635 peck rd
arcadia CA 91006
Manufacturer (Section G)
POSEY, S. DE R.L. DE C.V.
ave ferrocarrill no. 16901. bo
colonial rio tijuana,3ra. etap
tijuana, mexico 22664
MX   22664
Manufacturer Contact
william hincy
5635 peck road
arcadia, CA 91006
6264433143
MDR Report Key6081134
MDR Text Key59288870
Report Number2020362-2016-00047
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code OYS
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
PK103817
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type distributor
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 10/04/2016
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Other Caregivers
Device Model Number8070
Device Catalogue Number8070
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer10/27/2016
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 10/04/2016
Initial Date FDA Received11/07/2016
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured09/04/2014
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Reuse
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-