|
Catalog Number 226.662 |
Device Problems
Break (1069); Material Fragmentation (1261)
|
Patient Problem
No Code Available (3191)
|
Event Date 08/23/2016 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Additional device product code used hwc.(b)(6).(b)(4).Device history records review was completed for part # 226.662, lot # 9908501.Manufacturing location: (b)(4), manufacturing date: april 12, 2016.No non conformance reports were generated during production.Review of the device history records showed that there were no issues during the manufacture of the product that would contribute to this complaint condition.The device was received and the product evaluation is in progress.No conclusion can be drawn.Device used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
|
Event Description
|
Device report from synthes europe reports an event in (b)(6) as follow: it was reported that a plate fractured post-operatively.On (b)(6) 2016, patient underwent revision procedure and removed the plate.No fragments remained in the patient.No information about patient condition and outcome is available.This report is for one (1) plate.This is report 1 of 1 for (b)(4).
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Manufacturing evaluation was completed for part # 226.662, lot # 9908501.The product was returned in a packaging different from the original packaging.The laser marking was readable.The plate shows scratches and abrasion.Also the threaded holes show strong abrasion.The plate is broken at the location of drill hole 9.Review of the device history records showed that there were no issues during the manufacture of the product that would contribute to this complaint condition.All dimensions relevant for the function of the product were measured, and fulfill the specifications.The raw material certificates were checked and it was found that all used raw material fulfilled the specifications.Based on this the complaint is rated as confirmed but not valid from the point of view of the manufacturing site.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that the breakage occured while patient was walking on crutches on (b)(6) 2016.The breakage happened on a hole that was not occupied by a screw.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|