• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: CODMAN AND SHURTLEFF, INC ENTERPRISE VASCULAR RECONSTRUCTION DEVICE AND DELIVERY SYSTEM; INTRACRANIAL NEUROVASCULAR STENT

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

CODMAN AND SHURTLEFF, INC ENTERPRISE VASCULAR RECONSTRUCTION DEVICE AND DELIVERY SYSTEM; INTRACRANIAL NEUROVASCULAR STENT Back to Search Results
Catalog Number UNKENTERPRISEENC
Device Problem Occlusion Within Device (1423)
Patient Problems Neurological Deficit/Dysfunction (1982); Transient Ischemic Attack (2109)
Event Date 11/26/2015
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Concomitant medications: aspirin 325mg/day and thienopyridine derivative 7 days prior to the index procedure, clopidogrel 75 mg/day and aspirin 75 to 325 mg/day post procedure.Three attempts to obtain additional information, including the date of the procedure and device catalog number, lot number, manufacture date and expiration dates were unsuccessful.Literature article attached to this mdr report: brasiliense l.B, yoon j.W., orina j.N., et al.(01 feb 2016).A reappraisal of anterior communicating artery aneurysms: a case for stent-assisted embolization, neurosurgery.78 (2) (pp 200-207), 2016.Udi: unknown part number, all 3 attempts to obtain product were unsuccessful, udi unavailable as reported via the literature article a reappraisal of anterior communicating artery aneurysms: a case for stent-assisted embolization by: brasiliense l.B.C.; yoon j.W.; orina j.N.Et al, (2016), patient # 17 experienced in-stent restenosis, transient ischemic attacks and gait difficulty after implantation of an enterprise stent.During the index procedure, the patient underwent stent assisted coil embolization of an incidentally discovered aneurysm 14mm in size.Digital subtracted angiography showed a large bi-lobed aneurysm arising from the anterior communicating artery and cross-filling of the contralateral a2 segment.An enterprise stent (lot unknown) was placed from the ipsilateral a1 to the contralateral a2 to obtain adequate coverage of the neck and the irregular aneurysm sac was coiled sequentially until minimal opacification was noted on contrast injections; the aneurysm was coiled though the struts of the stent.The patient presented with ischemic complications post-operatively.The patient developed transient ischemic attacks and gait difficulty approximately 3 months after the procedure following discontinuation of clopidogrel.Follow-up digital subtracted angiography 7 months after treatment revealed severe in-stent stenosis (80%) and persistent occlusion of the aneurysm.The patient was restarted on dual antiplatelet therapy, and the authors performed an uneventful balloon angioplasty of the stenotic segment with adequate reopening and filling of the distal segments of the anterior cerebral artery.Angiography revealed significant improvement of the stenosis and stable occlusion of the aneurysm without evidence of aneurysm recurrence.The patient had a partial recovery on clinical exam (b)(4).The purpose of the study described in the article was to assess the long-term clinical and angiographic outcomes of stent-assisted embolization for wide-necked anterior communicating artery aneurysms.Between march 2008 and march 2014, 32 patients with unruptured wide necked anterior communicating artery aneurysms were treated using stent-assisted embolization.The mean aneurysm size was 7.3mm (range, 3.2-23.0 mm) and all lesions had a wide-neck (dome-to-neck ratio.2) and were considered unfavorable for primary coiling.In all cases, only 1 stent was used.There were no peri-procedural thromboembolic or hemorrhagic complications.The device was not available for analysis.In addition, the lot number could not be obtained; therefore, a dhr review could not be performed.Stenosis of the stented segment and neurological deficit are known potential adverse events associated with the use of the enterprise vrd as outlined in the instructions for use.Underlying patient and procedural factors may play a role; however, based on the available information, no conclusion can be made regarding possible contributing factors.There is no indication of any manufacturing issues related to the event.Therefore, no corrective actions will be taken.This is an initial/final mdr report.Three attempts to obtain additional information, including the date of the procedure and device catalog number, lot number, manufacture date and expiration dates were unsuccessful.
 
Event Description
As reported via the literature article a reappraisal of anterior communicating artery aneurysms: a case for stent-assisted embolization by: brasiliense l.B.C.; yoon j.W.; orina j.N.; miller d.A.; tawk r.G.; hanel r.A.Neurosurgery.78 (2) (pp 200-207), 2016.Date of publication: 01 feb 2016, patient # 17 experienced in-stent restenosis, transient ischemic attacks and gait difficulty after implantation of an enterprise stent.During the index procedure, the patient underwent stent assisted coil embolization of an incidentally discovered aneurysm 14mm in size.Digital subtracted angiography showed a large bi-lobed aneurysm arising from the anterior communicating artery and cross-filling of the contralateral a2 segment.An enterprise stent (lot unknown) was placed from the ipsilateral a1 to the contralateral a2 to obtain adequate coverage of the neck and the irregular aneurysm sac was coiled sequentially until minimal opacification was noted on contrast injections; the aneurysm was coiled though the struts of the stent.The patient presented with ischemic complications post-operatively.The patient developed transient ischemic attacks and gait difficulty approximately 3 months after the procedure following discontinuation of clopidogrel.Follow-up digital subtracted angiography 7 months after treatment revealed severe in-stent stenosis (80%) and persistent occlusion of the aneurysm.The patient was restarted on dual antiplatelet therapy, and the authors performed an uneventful balloon angioplasty of the stenotic segment with adequate reopening and filling of the distal segments of the anterior cerebral artery.Angiography revealed significant improvement of the stenosis and stable occlusion of the aneurysm without evidence of aneurysm recurrence.The patient had a partial recovery on clinical exam (b)(4).The purpose of the study described in the article was to assess the long-term clinical and angiographic outcomes of stent-assisted embolization for wide-necked anterior communicating artery aneurysms.Between march 2008 and march 2014, 32 patients with unruptured wide necked anterior communicating artery aneurysms were treated using stent-assisted embolization.The mean aneurysm size was 7.3mm (range, 3.2-23.0 mm) and all lesions had a wide-neck (dome-to-neck ratio.2) and were considered unfavorable for primary coiling.In all cases, only 1 stent was used.There were no peri-procedural thromboembolic or hemorrhagic complications.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
ENTERPRISE VASCULAR RECONSTRUCTION DEVICE AND DELIVERY SYSTEM
Type of Device
INTRACRANIAL NEUROVASCULAR STENT
Manufacturer (Section D)
CODMAN AND SHURTLEFF, INC
325 paramount dr
raynham MA
Manufacturer Contact
karen anigbo
325 paramount dr
raynham, MA 02767
5088288374
MDR Report Key6095460
MDR Text Key59721513
Report Number1226348-2016-00166
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code NJE
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
H60001
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type health professional,literatur
Reporter Occupation Health Professional
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 10/19/2016
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue NumberUNKENTERPRISEENC
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 10/20/2016
Initial Date FDA Received11/11/2016
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age65 YR
-
-