• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES COSGROVE-EDWARDS® ANNULOPLASTY SYSTEM; ANNULOPLASTY RING

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES COSGROVE-EDWARDS® ANNULOPLASTY SYSTEM; ANNULOPLASTY RING Back to Search Results
Model Number 4600
Device Problem Appropriate Term/Code Not Available (3191)
Patient Problems Corneal Pannus (1447); Mitral Regurgitation (1964); Mitral Valve Stenosis (1965)
Event Date 07/27/2016
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Additional manufacturer narrative: the device was not returned to edwards for evaluation as healthcare provider reported it was discarded.The device history record (dhr) was not reviewed as the reported event does not allege a malfunction that could be related to a manufacturing deficiency and/or one was not confirmed through investigation.Post-operatively, the body undergoes various phases of the tissue response continuum resulting in the fibrous encapsulation of the ring.Local and systemic factors of the patient may play a role in the wound healing and inflammatory responses to biomaterials and implants.Based on the information received the cause cannot be determined; however, patient factors may have contributed to the event.Edwards will continue to review and monitor all events.Trends are monitored on a monthly basis and if action is required, appropriate investigation will be performed.
 
Event Description
Edwards lifesciences maintains an implant patient registry.This registry is a patient tracking mechanism for serialized edwards implantable devices (bioprosthetic heart valves and annuloplasty rings), rather than a true post-market surveillance registry.Through the registry, edwards is notified when these devices are implanted.In addition, patient and/or device status may be reported to the registry via the implantation data cards.The information is received from various sources (e.G.Surgeon, hospital, and patient family members) and is not received in the form of a conventional "customer complaint." the information reported may or may not be related to the edwards device.In this case, edwards learned a 32mm mitral ring was explanted after an implant duration of two years, one month, due to severe mitral regurgitation, mitral valve prolapse, and moderate stenosis.At explant of the 32mm ring it was noted there was severe fibrosis thickening related to the annuloplasty ring."there was also very severe pericardial reaction suggesting probable rheumatic pericarditis." the explanted device was replaced with a 27mm mitral valve.The patient tolerated the procedure well.Patient is status seven on the heart transplant list.Patient was discharged on post operative day 14.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
COSGROVE-EDWARDS® ANNULOPLASTY SYSTEM
Type of Device
ANNULOPLASTY RING
Manufacturer (Section D)
EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES
one edwards way
irvine CA 92614
Manufacturer (Section G)
EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES LLC
one edwards way
irvine CA 92614
Manufacturer Contact
neil landry
1 edwards way
ms mle-2
irvine, CA 92614
9492502289
MDR Report Key6095623
MDR Text Key59719426
Report Number2015691-2016-03348
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code KRH
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K923367
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type health professional,other,use
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 10/19/2016
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date06/10/2017
Device Model Number4600
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 11/11/2016
Initial Date FDA Received11/11/2016
Supplement Dates Manufacturer ReceivedNot provided
Supplement Dates FDA Received11/11/2016
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured06/20/2012
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Hospitalization; Required Intervention;
Patient Age15 YR
Patient Weight51
-
-