Additional narrative: (b)(4).(b)(6).The device was returned for service; however, did not meet manufacturing specifications during pre-repair assessment.Reliability engineering evaluated the device and the reported condition was confirmed.The assignable root cause was determined to be due to improper maintenance, which is user error/misuse/abuse.If additional information should become available, a supplemental medwatch report will be submitted accordingly.
|
It was reported by (b)(6) that before use on the patient it was observed that the motor device displayed an f5 error.The reporter stated that it may have been an e5 error.During service and evaluation, it was noted that the device locking mechanism was not functioning.It was noted that the device was in bad shape, the locking components were completely worn out, some of the connector pins were loose, and the motor was worn.During pretest, the device failed: temperature, noise, and safety assessments.This event did not occur during surgery.There was no patient involvement.There were no reports of injuries, medical intervention or prolonged hospitalization.All available information has been disclosed.If additional information should become available, a supplemental medwatch report will be submitted accordingly.
|