This follow-up report is being submitted to relay additional information.If any further information is found which would change or alter any conclusions or information, a supplemental report will be filed accordingly.Zimmer biomet will continue to monitor for trends.This report is being submitted to update additional information in section a1, a2, b4, b5, d4, g3, g4, g6, h2, h6, and h10.
|
This follow-up report is being submitted to relay additional information.No product was returned or pictures provided; visual and dimensional evaluations could not be performed.Review of the device history records identified no deviations or anomalies during manufacturing of the fossa component.Medical records were provided and reviewed by a health care professional.Review of the available records identified the following: the patient underwent an initial left tmj procedure.Subsequently, the patient was revised due to pain and noise sensitivity at which time the left tmj fossa comp was explanted.There was reported sensitivity to loud noises in the left ear that gradually worsened and pain.Patient stated a portion of the implant was leaning against the ear canal causing the issues that were reported.A definitive root cause cannot be determined.The patient stated a portion of the implant was leaning against the ear canal, however, this could not be confirmed.If any further information is found which would change or alter any conclusions or information, a supplemental report will be filed accordingly.Zimmer biomet will continue to monitor for trends.
|