|
Catalog Number 323.062 |
Device Problems
Break (1069); Material Fragmentation (1261)
|
Patient Problems
Device Embedded In Tissue or Plaque (3165); No Code Available (3191)
|
Event Date 10/25/2016 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Device used for treatment, not diagnosis.Device is an instrument and is not implanted/explanted.Device is expected to be returned to synthes manufacturer for evaluation /investigation, but has yet to be received.(b)(4).The tip of the drill bit broke off and the surgeon left it retained in the patient's bone.A device history record review was performed for the complaint part & device lot.The 323.062 / 9858400.Manufacturing location: (b)(4).Manufacturing date: 10th march 2016.Neither deviation nor any ncrs were marked in this document.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
|
Event Description
|
Device report from synthes on an event in (b)(6) as follows: it was reported that the reported device was used in surgery for the distal humeral fractures on (b)(6) 2016.By using va (variable angle) drill sleeve, the surgeon tried to drill the second most distal hole on the inner plate.However, the drill sleeve could not be fixed into the hole.The surgeon then tried re-drilling with double drill sleeve 2.7.Because the insertion angle was not properly lined up, he tried re-drilling without taking out the drill completely from the bone.Because the drill was being distorted, the drill tip chipped by approximately 15 mm.He tried to remove the chipped fragment but thought that this removal might have enlarged the drill hole.Therefore, he decided to leave it in the body.The surgery was extended for three minutes.This complaint involves 2 parts.This report is 1 of 1 for com-(b)(4).
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Additional narrative: (b)(6).The device was received, the investigation could not be completed, and no conclusion could be drawn, as product is entering the complaint system.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
The measurable dimension of the diameter of the shaft shows conformity to the specification.Measured hardness and it was found within specification.No manufacturing related issue could be identified.Reviewing the device history records shows that this lot was manufactured according to the specifications and the lot was released after final inspection with no findings.No ncrs were generated during production.Review of the device history record(s) showed that there were no issues during the manufacture of the product that would contribute to this complaint condition.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|