• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MEDTRONIC XOMED INC. XPS® BLADE; BUR, EAR, NOSE AND THROAT

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MEDTRONIC XOMED INC. XPS® BLADE; BUR, EAR, NOSE AND THROAT Back to Search Results
Model Number 1884002
Device Problem Material Fragmentation (1261)
Patient Problem No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
Event Date 10/21/2016
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
Product evaluation: 2 un-sealed samples, part number 1884002, from lot number 0211682835 were received for analysis; there was evidence of biological contaminants [based off of the reactivity with hydrogen peroxide] on both samples.When compared to the assembly drawing: visually, the tip of the inner cutter as broke off both samples.The portions that detached measured approximately 0.23 in length.When viewed under magnification, the inner cutters had fractured at the first proximal tooth valley.The deformation of the tips indicates the inner cutters impacted the outer tubes during rotation.This defect may occur if the blade was being used in the wrong direction (forward vs.Oscillate), ran over the recommended speed designated by labeled indications, or came in contact with an inappropriate material.The recommended operating speed is 5,000 rpm in oscillate mode / direction.The instructions for use indicate this blade is used for the resection of soft tissue or bone and warn, insertion of metal objects in blade or bur tip may cause the blade or bur to break.
 
Event Description
It was reported that during a maxillary sinusotomy, the surgeon proceeded to ask for the shaver and started using it by the interior ethmoid when, it just stop working.Initially we thought the blade was clogged, passed the brush through it and it was clear, so tried using it again with no luck.A replacement blade was requested.As we started attaching the other blade to the shaver we noticed that the patient was bleeding a little and started to suction when we noticed a metal tip.After inspecting the item we came to realize it was the tip of the inner blade of the shaver.After removing it from the patient's sinus he tried using the new tip that was placed on the shaver; as soon as that shaver began the same thing happened.The second tip landed outside the patient.There was no patient impact or injury.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
XPS® BLADE
Type of Device
BUR, EAR, NOSE AND THROAT
Manufacturer (Section D)
MEDTRONIC XOMED INC.
6743 southpoint dr north
jacksonville FL 32216
Manufacturer (Section G)
MEDTRONIC XOMED INC.
6743 southpoint dr north
jacksonville FL 32216
Manufacturer Contact
michelle alford
6743 southpoint drive north
jacksonville, FL 32216
9043328197
MDR Report Key6106356
MDR Text Key60091274
Report Number1045254-2016-00390
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code EQJ
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
EXEMPT
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,health
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 10/21/2016
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model Number1884002
Device Catalogue Number1884002
Device Lot Number0211682835
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer11/14/2016
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 10/21/2016
Initial Date FDA Received11/16/2016
Supplement Dates Manufacturer ReceivedNot provided
04/03/2017
Supplement Dates FDA Received04/03/2017
09/26/2017
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured07/26/2016
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age73 YR
-
-