• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: THERAKOS, INC THERAKOS CELLEX PHOTOPHERESIS SYSTEM

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

THERAKOS, INC THERAKOS CELLEX PHOTOPHERESIS SYSTEM Back to Search Results
Lot Number E331-KIT
Device Problems Occlusion Within Device (1423); Device Displays Incorrect Message (2591)
Patient Problem No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
Event Date 10/19/2016
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
The system was used for treatment.A batch record review of kit lot e331 was conducted.There were no nonconformances associated with this lot.The lot met release requirements.The uvadex lot number was not provided as it was not administered.However, a review of all uvadex lots manufactured since january 2013 was performed.No trends or nonconformances related to the complaint were noted.Trends were reviewed for complaint categories, alarm #16: collect pressure, alarm #1: air detected, and clot observed.No trends were detected for these complaint categories.The assessment is based on information available at the time of the investigation.No product was returned for investigation; therefore, it could not be determined if the product met specification based solely on the information provided by the customer.Complaints are monitored through tracking and trending.If a trend is detected, further investigation will be conducted.(b)(4).
 
Event Description
The customer called to report multiple alarm #16: collect pressure and alarm #1: air detected alarms during the main collect phase of the procedure.The customer stated that there was no evidence of air in the tubing lines.The customer reported that when they flushed the patient's access they pulled clots out of the patient's vascular access.The customer stated that they also observed clots in both the collect and return lines.The customer reported that heparin was used as the anticoagulant and the concentration in the anticoagulant bag was 10,000 units/500ml of normal saline.The customer stated that the anticoagulant ratio was 8:1.The customer reported that the anticoagulant bag was connected to the correct fluid spike.The customer stated that the treatment was aborted with no blood/products returned to the patient.The customer reported that the patient was in stable condition.The customer stated that they were going to draw some labs in order to assess if there was a medical issue that caused the clotting.On 10/21/2016, the customer reported that the patient remained stable and all of the coagulation studies were normal.The customer stated that the patient did not require any medical intervention.The customer reported that the patient completed a second treatment on (b)(6) 2016 without any issues.The customer stated that they were not able to determine what had caused the clotting in the kit during the treatment on (b)(6) 2016.The customer reported that they did not test the contents of the anticoagulant bag in order to determine if the heparin was actually in the bag.The kit was not returned for investigation.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
THERAKOS CELLEX PHOTOPHERESIS SYSTEM
Type of Device
CELLEX
Manufacturer (Section D)
THERAKOS, INC
hampton NJ
Manufacturer (Section G)
THERAKOS, INC.
10 north high street
suite 300
west chester PA 19380
Manufacturer Contact
megan vernak
53 frontage road
hampton, NJ 08827
MDR Report Key6115060
MDR Text Key60747995
Report Number2523595-2016-00246
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LNR
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P860003
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type health professional,user faci
Reporter Occupation Nurse
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 10/19/2016
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Nurse
Device Expiration Date06/01/2018
Device Lot NumberE331-KIT
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 10/19/2016
Initial Date FDA Received11/18/2016
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured06/01/2016
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-