(b)(4).Reporter's complete address and phone number were not provided.The device was returned for service; however, did not meet manufacturing specifications during pre-repair assessment.Reliability engineering evaluated the device and the reported condition was confirmed.The assignable root cause was determined to be due to wear from normal use and servicing over time.If additional information should become available, a supplemental medwatch report will be submitted accordingly.
|
It was reported by (b)(6) that the motor device was overheating.During service and evaluation, it was noted that the device motor and tool coupling were defective, very badly worn, and there was immediate smoke detection during commissioning.It was also noted that the bearings were damaged and the device failed pre-repair diagnostic tests for loctite and cable assessments (cover cap missing).It was not reported if this event occurred during a surgical procedure.It was reported that there was no delay in a procedure due to the event.It was not reported if a spare device was available for use.There was no patient involvement.There were no reports of injuries, medical intervention or prolonged hospitalization.The exact date of this event was unknown.All available information has been disclosed.If additional information should become available, a supplemental medwatch report will be submitted accordingly.
|