The device was returned for evaluation.An event regarding crack/fracture involving an exeter stem was reported.The event was confirmed following visual inspection.Method & results: device evaluation and results: visual inspection :visual inspection was performed as part of the material analysis report (mar).The parts were examined with the aid of a stereo microscope at magnifications up to 50x.The review noted the following: damage consistent with the explantation process and cement-mantle breakdown was observed on the stem.Sem analysis was completed on the stem.The location of fracture origin is shown origin is approximately located at or near the prehension hole of the stem.Fatigue striations were observed on the fracture surface, indicating the stem fractured in fatigue.The location of final fracture was noted, with ductile fracture morphologies being observed.This indicates the final fracture occurred in overload.Energy-dispersive spectroscopy (eds) analysis was performed on the stem a continuous metal transfer ring was observed on the taper of the head, indicating proper seating between the stem trunnion and head taper.Based on crack propagation, the head likely fractured due to internal hoop stress.The hip stem fractured.Medical records received and evaluation: a review of the operative report by a clinical consultant concluded, no confirmation of event, need x-rays, clinical past medical history, operative reports.Device history review: all devices in the reported lot were manufactured and accepted into final stock with no relevant reported discrepancies.Complaint history review: there have been no other similar events for the reported lot.Conclusions: fatigue striations were observed on the fracture surface, indicating the stem fractured in fatigue.The location of final fracture was noted, with ductile fracture morphologies being observed.This indicates the final fracture occurred in overload.
|