BIOSENSE WEBSTER (ISRAEL) LTD. CARTO® 3 SYSTEM; SIMILAR DEVICE FG540000, 510K # K042999
|
Back to Search Results |
|
Model Number FG-5400-00K |
Device Problem
Failure to Align (2522)
|
Patient Problem
No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
|
Event Date 10/31/2016 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
The hardware investigation has begun but it has not been completed at this time.When the investigational analysis has been completed, a supplemental 3500a report will be submitted.(b)(4).
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that a patient underwent an atrial fibrillation procedure with a carto 3 system.It was reported that while mapping with the carto 3 system, when the catheter was moved and returned to a previous location, the location tags were misaligned.The position of the catheter on the carto 3 system and fluoroscopy were misaligned.There were no error messages and the metal values were within normal limits.The map shift was estimated at approximately 2.5 cm.It was not known if a cardioversion was performed or if there was patient movement to explain the map shift.The procedure was completed using the system with this issue.There were no patient consequences.This event was assessed as a reportable malfunction as such map shifts could potentially be caused by system malfunction, and there would be a potential risk to the patient.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
(b)(4).It was reported that a patient underwent an atrial fibrillation procedure with a carto 3 system.It was reported that while mapping with the carto 3 system, when the catheter was moved and returned to a previous location, the location tags were misaligned.The position of the catheter on the carto 3 system and fluoroscopy were misaligned.There were no error messages and the metal values were within normal limits.The map shift was estimated at approximately 2.5 cm.It was not known if a cardioversion was performed or if there was patient movement to explain the map shift.The procedure was completed using the system with this issue.There were no patient consequences.It was reported that the customer declined repair.The system was returned to customer by request of the customer.It was also reported that the system is functional.The device history record (dhr) review was performed by the manufacturer and no anomalies, which are related to the reported issue, were noted in manufacturing or servicing of this equipment.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|