The information provided by bard represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bard.The following were reviewed as part of this investigation: patient severity, trend analysis, applicable previous investigation(s), sample (if available), applicable fmea documents, labeling, and applicable manufacture records.Based on a review of this information, the following was concluded: the complaint of material in the catheter could be confirmed from the returned photographs, but the origin and composition of the material could not be verified from the photos.Two images were provided for investigation.The returned images appear to be photographs of a monitor, which shows the distal tip of what could be a access catheter.Photo #1 shows two gloved fingers, the distal tip of a catheter, and what appears to be foreign material protruding from the distal tip of the catheter.Drops of liquid are seen on the blue drape, over which the catheter was placed.The second photo shows the distal end of the catheter and what could be a 1-2 cm strip of white/translucent material on the blue drape.The strip of material could be the material that was protruding from the distal tip of the catheter in the first image.It was reported that the catheter was used and noted to not be working well.It was at the time of removal that the material was observed, but the source or composition of the material could not be determined from the photographs.The photos will be provided to the manufacturing facility for further review.A lot history review (lhr) of rezi1887 showed no other similar product complaint(s) from this lot number.
|