|
Catalog Number 497.125 |
Device Problem
Device Operates Differently Than Expected (2913)
|
Patient Problems
Failure of Implant (1924); No Code Available (3191)
|
Event Date 10/26/2016 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Device used for treatment, not diagnosis.Patient information not available for reporting.(b)(4).Device is expected to be returned to synthes manufacturer for evaluation /investigation, but has yet to be received.(b)(6).It was reported that the patient heard a popping sound and there was an unspecified malfunction of parts which required additional surgical intervention to revise the construct.Without a lot number, the device history record review and the investigation could not be completed; no conclusion could be drawn, as no product was received.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
|
Event Description
|
(b)(6) reported the following: it was reported that a patient was implanted with a vertical expandable prosthetic titanium rib (veptr) ii system on an unknown date in (b)(6) 2009.On (b)(6) 2016, the patient underwent a scheduled lengthening procedure.On (b)(6) 2016, while the patient was running, they heard a popping sound.On (b)(6) 2016 the patient came to clinic and it was discovered on xray that something was wrong with the construct.The implanted devices were removed on (b)(6) 2016 and replaced with a magec growth rod (6.0), connected into the original veptr ii rib hook.This report is 3 of 3 for (b)(4).
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Partial lot number provided as 512x815.Part 497.125, lot 7763886: the device history record (dhr) did not contain any non-conformance reports or anomalies.Dhr records for the raw material underwent all required inspection and test requirements with no nonconformities reported.Review of the device history record(s) showed there were no issues during the manufacture of the product that would contribute to this complaint condition.The device was received, the investigation could not be completed, and no conclusion could be drawn, as product is entering the complaint system.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
|
Event Description
|
Upon examination of the receive devices by the manufacturer, it was noted that the proximal extension was broken and missing fragments.The remainder of the implants showed significant wear consistent with implantation and explanation but were intact.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis a product investigation was performed.The following device was received by customer quality (cq): one ti distraction lock (part number: 497.125, lot number: 7763886, mfg.Date: 04sep2014).A visual inspection, complaint history review, drawing review, and risk assessment review were performed as part of this investigation.A device history review was performed for the returned instrument¿s lot number and no mrrs, ncrs or complaint-related issues were identified with the lot number which may have contributed to the complaint condition.The returned part was determined to be suitable for its intended use when employed and maintained as recommended.After visual inspection of this implant and based on the complaint description it was determined this part did not contribute to the complaint and therefore no further investigation is required at this time including a dcrm review.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|