The reported event of a screw breakage could not be confirmed since the complained product was not returned.It was stated that blade 62-12170 was used in the reported case, which is appropriate for the usage with the complained screw.However, the complained screw was not returned for investigation.So the failure mode could not be attributed to a certain root cause.According to the related risk management file, the most likely root causes could have been: wrong pilot hole - screw interface due to wrong hole diameter/ tapped hole.Insufficient/too high bone quality.Wrong/ missing information.Reuse of single-use devices.Improper implant placement.Too much/ wrong forces between blade, screw and bone (e.G.Screw head deformation, screw breakage).Power tool usage for screw insertion (except qdm).Too much/ wrong compression/ torsional/ axial forces.Wrong rotational speed, unintended loads.Bone quality resulting in high torque.Improper blade disengaging.Collision with other implant or instrument.Predrilled hole not deep enough (e.G.Wrong choice of instrument/implant, system mix-up, poorly assembled/used instrument).Powered screw insertion with right angled screwdriver.Based on statistical evaluation there are no indications for any systematic design, material, or manufacturing related issue.Therefore, no corrective and/or preventive actions are deemed necessary at this time.The complaint is added to the complaint trend.
|