It was reported that after implantation of a catheter port, leakage was noted along with, ¿little holes on proximal end of part catheter.¿ the patient required an additional procedure to have another port implanted which has reportedly resulted in inflammation.No additional information was available at the time of this report.
|
Investigation - evaluation: a review of the complaint history, dimensional verification, documentation, device history record, documentation, instructions for use (ifu), specifications, trends, quality control and visual inspection of the returned device was conducted during the investigation.The returned port along with a catheter lock and a length of catheter was measured to be approximately 55.6 cm from the port housing base to the catheter end.The device was assembled when it was received, however, the catheter lock was not assembled correctly.The catheter lock was placed on the catheter backward.When flushed during decontamination, signs of a leak from the body of the catheter was observed.Under magnification, a small hole could be seen.Small gouges were also observed on the face of the port housing.There were puncture marks present in the port septum, and one of the suture holes appeared to be used.The surface of the catheter was smooth, showing no signs of calcification or burnishing.A second functional test was performed in which the small hole in the catheter was blocked; which verified that there were no occlusions in the catheter or the port housing.A document based investigation evaluation was also performed.There is no evidence to suggest the product was not made to specifications.Review of device history record shows no nonconforming events which; could contribute to this failure mode.It should be noted there were no other reported complaints for this lot number.Based on the information provided, examination of the returned device and the results of our investigation, operational context caused or contributed to the event.We will continue to monitor for similar complaints.Per the quality engineering risk assessment no further action is required.
|