• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: SYNTHES HAGENDORF INSERTER-EXTRACTOR FOR TI TIBIAL & HUMERAL NAILS

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

SYNTHES HAGENDORF INSERTER-EXTRACTOR FOR TI TIBIAL & HUMERAL NAILS Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 356.490
Device Problem Mechanical Jam (2983)
Patient Problem No Patient Involvement (2645)
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
Occurred post-operatively; there was no longer any patient involvement.Device is an instrument and is not implanted/explanted.(b)(6).Manufacturing location: (b)(4).Manufacturing date: july 22, 2016.No non-conformance reports were generated during production.Review of the device history record(s) showed that there were no issues during the manufacture of the product that would contribute to this complaint condition.The device was received, the investigation could not be completed, and no conclusion could be drawn, as product is entering the complaint system.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
 
Event Description
Device report from synthes europe reports an event in (b)(6) as follows: it was reported that dismantling of both the inserter/extractor for solid/cannulated tibial nail (utn/ctn) and the connection screw for unreamed humeral nail (uhn) was not possible postoperatively.This is report 1 of 1 for (b)(4).
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Product investigation has been completed for part# 356.490, lot# 9613764.The returned device was analyzed for conformances to print specifications, as well as the device history records were researched.No abnormal findings were identified.The screw connection of the device was found completely jammed.The connection could not be solved with great force.Based on these results, we can exclude manufacturing fault.We can only assume that the occurrence may have been due to insufficient connection with this instrument.If the connection is not tight, the forces while hammering may cause the damage of the threaded connection.Since we are not aware of exact circumstances during the surgery, we suppose that a mechanical overloading situation must have led to the occurrence.Complaint is confirmed due to evidence that this instrument jammed, but considered not valid from manufacturing standpoint as there is no evidence of manufacturing related issues.No indication for product related issue was found.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
INSERTER-EXTRACTOR FOR TI TIBIAL & HUMERAL NAILS
Type of Device
EXTRACTOR
Manufacturer (Section D)
SYNTHES HAGENDORF
im bifang 6
hagendorf CH461 4
SZ  CH4614
Manufacturer (Section G)
SYNTHES HAGENDORF
im bifang 6
hagendorf CH461 4
SZ   CH4614
Manufacturer Contact
michael cote
1302 wrights lane east
west chester, PA 19380
6107195000
MDR Report Key6165883
MDR Text Key62388922
Report Number3003875359-2016-10645
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code HWB
UDI-Device Identifier07611819023529
UDI-Public(01)07611819023529(10)9613764
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
EXEMPT
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,foreig
Reporter Occupation Nurse
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 11/17/2016
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue Number356.490
Device Lot Number9613764
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer12/08/2016
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 11/17/2016
Initial Date FDA Received12/12/2016
Supplement Dates Manufacturer ReceivedNot provided
Supplement Dates FDA Received01/25/2017
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured07/22/2016
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Unknown
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-