• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: STRYKER ORTHOPAEDICS-MAHWAH UNKNOWN LINER; HIP IMPLANT

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

STRYKER ORTHOPAEDICS-MAHWAH UNKNOWN LINER; HIP IMPLANT Back to Search Results
Catalog Number UNK_REC
Device Problems Mechanical Problem (1384); Device Dislodged or Dislocated (2923); Unintended Movement (3026)
Patient Problems Tissue Damage (2104); Injury (2348); Joint Dislocation (2374); Reaction (2414)
Event Date 10/11/2016
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Reported event: an event regarding instability involving an unknown liner was reported.The event was confirmed.Method and results: device evaluation and results: a visual, functional and dimensional inspection could not be performed as the device was not returned; medical records received and evaluation: the provided medical records were reviewed by consulting clinician who indicated: "the primary harm involved is recurrent instability of the hip.The poor condition of the hip abductors undoubtedly plays a role in the recurrent instability.No evidence of implant design or manufacturing is presented.The patient had mildly elevate blood co,cr and ti ion levels and staining of the tissues with metallosis.The nature of the staining is not known.While it might be related to corrosion and wear of the trunion and head it also may reflect abnormal wear of the edge of the titanium cup as it articulated abnormally with a dislocated femoral head.There is insufficient documentation presented to complete this assessment."; device history review: not performed as the device was not properly identified; complaint history review: not performed as the device was not properly identified.Conclusions: the investigation concluded that instability was confirmed by the consulting clinician.The primary harm involved is recurrent instability of the hip.The poor condition of the hip abductors undoubtedly plays a role in the recurrent instability.No evidence of implant design or manufacturing is presented.If additional information and/or device becomes available, this investigation will be reopened.Product surveillance will continue to monitor for trends.
 
Event Description
The customer reported that the female patient presented with dislocation.She was revised on (b)(6) 2016 and the surgeon reported metallosis.Images of explanted devices indicate black on stem trunnion and inside the head.The surgeon further reported that the muscle of the abductors destroyed by armd.Patient had dislocation of thr 3 times prior to revision.Right side.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
An event regarding dislocation involving an unknown liner was reported.The event was confirmed.Method & results: -device evaluation and results: a visual, functional and dimensional inspection could not be performed as the device was not returned.-medical records received and evaluation: the provided medical records were reviewed by consulting clinician who indicated: "the primary harm involved is recurrent instability of the hip.The poor condition of the hip abductors undoubtedly plays a role in the recurrent instability.No evidence of implant design or manufacturing is presented.The patient had mildly elevate blood co, cr and ti ion levels and staining of the tissues with metallosis.The nature of the staining i.E., is not known.While it might be related to corrosion and wear of the trunnion and head it also may reflect abnormal wear of the edge of the titanium cup as it articulated abnormally with a dislocated femoral head.There is insufficient documentation presented to complete this assessment." -device history review: not performed as the device was not properly identified.-complaint history review: not performed as the device was not properly identified.Conclusions: the investigation concluded that reported event of dislocation.The clinician determined that the root cause of the event could have been the poor condition of the hip abductors however, there is insufficient documentation presented to complete this assessment.No evidence of implant design or manufacturing is presented.Further information such as primary operative report, implant records, dated pre- and post-op x-ray images, clinical notes and the explanted devices are needed to complete the investigation for determining root cause.If additional information and/or device becomes available, this investigation will be reopened.
 
Event Description
The customer reported that the female patient presented with dislocation.She was revised on (b)(6) 2016 and the surgeon reported metallosis.Images of explanted devices indicate black on stem trunnion and inside the head.The surgeon further reported that the muscle of the abductors destroyed by armd.Patient had dislocation of thr 3 times prior to revision.Right side.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
UNKNOWN LINER
Type of Device
HIP IMPLANT
Manufacturer (Section D)
STRYKER ORTHOPAEDICS-MAHWAH
325 corporate drive
mahwah NJ 07430
Manufacturer (Section G)
STRYKER ORTHOPAEDICS-MAHWAH
325 corporate drive
mahwah NJ 07430
Manufacturer Contact
cindy chuhinko
325 corporate drive
mahwah, NJ 07430
2018315000
MDR Report Key6171422
MDR Text Key62311280
Report Number0002249697-2016-03896
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code JDG
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeGB
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type health professional,other
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 01/26/2017
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue NumberUNK_REC
Device Lot NumberUNKNOWN
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 11/15/2016
Initial Date FDA Received12/13/2016
Supplement Dates Manufacturer ReceivedNot provided
Supplement Dates FDA Received01/26/2017
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Hospitalization; Required Intervention;
Patient Age78 YR
-
-