• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: COOK INC STANDARD FIXED CORE WIRE GUIDE; OCY ENDOSCOPIC GUIDEWIRE, GASTROENTEROLOGY-UROLOGY

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

COOK INC STANDARD FIXED CORE WIRE GUIDE; OCY ENDOSCOPIC GUIDEWIRE, GASTROENTEROLOGY-UROLOGY Back to Search Results
Model Number N/A
Device Problem Material Separation (1562)
Patient Problem Device Embedded In Tissue or Plaque (3165)
Event Date 02/29/2016
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
The event is currently under investigation.
 
Event Description
Per the (b)(4), reported through the fda voluntary event reporting process, the manufacturer was informed that: "the surgeon was attempting to insert a suprapubic catheter.The patient had a very large pannus.The cook needle was passed into the bladder under direct vision.A 0.035 guidewire was placed and gently dilated pt.Up to 14-french.The cope loop nephrostomy tube would not pass and the pt was dilated up to 16-french using the dilator; at which point, the wire was encountered.Multiple attempts were then made to try and get a length of wire that was not kinked and again the surgeon could not pass the cope loop through the belly wall, which was extremely thick.Eventually, in trying to re-dilate him with the stiff dilator, the wire broke.There was nothing visible at the skin; however, there was a piece of wire in the bladder.The surgeon grasped it using the flexible biopsy forceps and was able to unravel some of it, but could not remove the rest of it.At this point, with most of the wire in the bladder, the decision was made to leave the wire.About 2 months ago, the wire was removed as part of a planned evaluation/cystoscopy so did not result in an extra procedure." no additional information was available at the time of this report.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Investigation - evaluation: a review of the complaint history, manufacturing investigation, quality control, and specifications was conducted during the investigation.The device was not returned for further investigation.A device history record review could not be performed due to non-availability of device lot number.The investigator was unable to determine if any non-conformances within the manufacturing department were noted.Fracture testing was completed for this device family as part of design verification activities.However, since the device was not returned a device failure analysis could not be completed.Based on the information provided, and the results of the investigation, a definitive root cause could not be determined.We will continue to monitor for similar complaints.Per the quality engineering risk assessment no further action is required.Per the risk assessment no further action is required.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
STANDARD FIXED CORE WIRE GUIDE
Type of Device
OCY ENDOSCOPIC GUIDEWIRE, GASTROENTEROLOGY-UROLOGY
Manufacturer (Section D)
COOK INC
750 daniels way
bloomington IN 47404
Manufacturer Contact
larry pool
750 daniels way
bloomington, IN 47404
8123392235
MDR Report Key6178202
MDR Text Key62467062
Report Number1820334-2016-01495
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code OCY
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K082536
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type other
Reporter Occupation Other Health Care Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 05/24/2017
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberN/A
Device Catalogue Number635413
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 11/15/2016
Initial Date FDA Received12/15/2016
Supplement Dates Manufacturer ReceivedNot provided
Supplement Dates FDA Received05/24/2017
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age66 YR
-
-