It was reported that an inaccurately low cco value was observed during use after surgery.The customer referenced ico instead.The patient was not treated based on the incorrect values.Information such as the indicated value, the expected value, if an error message was observed or if occlusion, leakage or kink was noted in the catheter could not be confirmed.There were no patient complications reported.Patient demographic information requested but unavailable.
|
One catheter with attached monoject 1.5 cc limited volume syringe and four non-edwards caps with a manifold was returned for evaluation.A non-edwards introducer with a non-edwards contamination shield was located on the catheter between 22 cm and 70 cm proximal from the catheter tip.No packaging was returned.No fault messages appeared on the lab vigilance ii monitor when the catheter was connected.The thermistor was found to read 37.0 c when submerged into a 37.0 c water bath.The catheter ran cco in 37.0 c water bath on vigilance ii monitor for 5 minutes without error.The thermistor and thermal filament circuit were continuous, there were no open or intermittent conditions.No visible inconsistency was observed on eeprom data.Resistance value of the thermal filament circuit was within specification, measuring 39.94 ohms.Both the thermistor and thermal filament connectors were opened and no visible inconsistencies were found.Blood was found from the strain relief and attached non-edwards introducer.No other visible to the catheter body, balloon, or returned syringe was observed.All through lumens were patent without any leakage or occlusion.The balloon inflated clear, concentric and remained inflated for more than 5 minutes without leakage.Balloon inflation testing was performed using returned syringe with 1.5 cc air.Visual examination was performed under microscope at 20x magnification and with the unaided eyes.Customer report of inaccurate cco value could not be confirmed during the analysis, as the device responded appropriately during functional testing.There was no evidence of a manufacturing nonconformance.No further actions will be taken at this time.Invasive procedures involve some patient risks.Although serious complications are relatively uncommon, the physician is advised, before deciding to insert or use the catheter, to consider the potential benefits in relation to the possible complications.The techniques for insertion, methods of using the catheter to obtain patient data information, and the occurrence of complications is well described in the literature.With any hemodynamic monitoring, pressure readings can change quickly and dramatically.Pressure readings should correlate with the patient¿s clinical manifestations.In this case it is unknown whether any user or procedural factors may have contributed to the stated event.Complaint histories for all reported events are reviewed against trending control limits on a monthly basis, and any excursions above the control limits are assessed and documented as part of this monthly review.No corrective or preventative actions are required at this time.
|